Table 9.

Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting 2006 eligibility criteria for MTM services based on logistic regression (sensitivity analysis 5).^a

	Estimate	Standard error	Wald chi-square	P	Odds ratio (OR)	95% confidence interval for OR
Intercept	−2.24	0.75	8.93	0.003	-	-
Non-Hispanic Whites	-	-	-	-	-	-
Non-Hispanic Blacks	−0.38	0.17	5.25	0.02	0.69	0.50–0.95
Hispanics	−0.46	0.22	4.48	0.03	0.63	0.42–0.97
Age	−0.05	0.01	14.94	0.0001	0.95	0.93–0.98
Female	-	-	-	-	-	-
Male	−0.41	0.11	14.64	0.0001	0.66	0.54–0.82
Not married	-	-	-	-	-	-
Married	0.04	0.11	0.12	0.73	1.04	0.84–1.28
Lower than high school	-	-	-	-	-	-
High school	−0.01	0.11	0.01	0.93	0.99	0.80–1.23
Higher than high school	0.19	0.12	2.62	0.11	1.21	0.96–1.51
100% FPLb	-	-	-	-	-	-
100%–149% FPL	0.20	0.13	2.56	0.11	1.23	0.96–1.57
150%–199% FPL	0.15	0.15	0.97	0.32	1.16	0.86–1.58
200%–300% FPL	0.43	0.15	8.09	0.005	1.54	1.14–2.08
Higher than 300% FPL	0.40	0.12	10.35	0.001	1.49	1.17–1.91
Northeast	-	-	-	-	-	-
Midwest	−0.09	0.15	0.36	0.55	0.92	0.69–1.22
South	−0.24	0.13	3.49	0.06	0.79	0.61–1.01
West	−0.47	0.19	6.02	0.01	0.63	0.43–0.91
Not MSAc	-	-	-	-	-	-
Yes MSA	−0.22	0.11	3.61	0.06	0.81	0.65–1.01
Excellent self-perceived health status	-	-	-	-	-	-
Very good self-perceived health status	0.82	0.24	11.58	0.0007	2.28	1.42–3.65
Good self-perceived health status	1.73	0.25	46.86	<.0001	5.62	3.43–9.21
Fair self-perceived health status	2.50	0.26	94.83	<.0001	12.22	7.38–20.23
Poor self-perceived health status	3.14	0.28	122.31	<.0001	23.07	13.23–40.23
Risk adjustment summary score	3.38	0.61	30.67	<.0001	29.48	8.90–97.63

^aEligibility thresholds examined: 6 Part D drugs, 5 chronic conditions, and $4,000 in drug costs. Wald’s statistic: 897.75 (P < .0001).

^bFPL=Federal poverty level.

^cMSA=Metropolitan statistical Area.