Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2014 Apr;21(4):330–338. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31829e4089

Table 4.

Change in secondary outcomes (sleep and mood) by exercise arm

Intent to Treat Analysis1 N Exercise
Mean (95% CI)
N Usual Activity
Mean (95% CI)
Difference
Mean (95% CI)
p-value2
ISI Sleep 0.025
 Baseline 104 11.5 (10.4, 12.7) 140 12.2 (11.4, 13.1) −0.7 (−2.1, 0.7)
 Week 12 – baseline 80 −4.0 (−5.1, −2.9) 130 −3.1 (−3.9, −2.4) −0.9 (−2.2, 0.4)

PSQI Sleep 0.007
 Baseline 103 7.8 (7.1, 8.5) 139 8.4 (7.8, 8.9) −0.6 (−1.4, 0.2)
 Week 12 – baseline 79 −2.4 (−3.1, −1.7) 131 −1.6 (−2.1, −1.1) −0.8 (−1.6, 0.0)

Depression (PHQ-8) 0.028
 Baseline 105 4.0 (3.2, 4.8) 140 4.1 (3.5, 4.6) −0.1 (−1.1, 0.9)
 Week 12 – baseline 78 −0.9 (−1.6, −0.1) 133 0.1 (−0.5, 0.7) −1.0 (−2.0, 0.0)

Anxiety (GAD-7) 0.156
 Baseline 106 3.4 (2.6, 4.2) 142 3.0 (2.5, 3.5) 0.4 (−0.5, 1.3)
 Week 12 – baseline 82 −0.8 (−1.6, −0.1) 135 −0.1 (−0.7, 0.4) −0.7 (−1.6, 0.2)
1

includes all participants with follow-up measures, regardless of adherence to intervention

2

p-values from contrasts comparing exercise vs. usual activity in a linear model of outcome as a function of intervention arm, clinical center, omega-3 intervention assignment, and baseline outcome value. A p-value < 0.0125 was considered statistically significant when accounting for the 4 secondary outcome comparisons of interest.

3

hot flash frequency values were log transformed for modeling