Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e83588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083588

Table 1. Meta-analysis of risk estimates of dietary methionine intake (highest versus lowest) and risk of incident colorectal cancer.

Number of studies References RR (95 % CI)
Heterogeneity test
Random-effect model Fix-effects model P I 2 (%)
All studies 8 12-18 0.89 (0.77-1.03) 0.89 (0.79-1.00) 0.18 29.1
Follow-up
>10 years 5 12,15,16,17 0.81 (0.70-0.95) 0.82 (0.71-0.94) 0.33 13.6
<10 years 3 13,14,18 1.08 (0.87-1.34) 1.08 (0.87-1.34) 0.48 0.0
Number of cases
>500 4 12,14-16 0.89 (0.74-1.08) 0.89 (0.76-1.03) 0.24 26.0
<500 4 13,17,18 0.89 (0.69-1.15) 0.89 (0.75-1.07) 0.12 49.4
Areas
Asian 2 14,18 1.19 (0.90-1.57) 1.19 (0.90-1.57) 0.53 0.0
Western 6 12,13,15-17 0.83 (0.73-0.95) 0.83 (0.73-0.95) 0.40 3.9
Sex
Men 3 12,14,17 0.75 (0.57-0.99) 0.75 (0.58-0.97) 0.31 15.2
Women 7 12-18 0.94 (0.80-1.09) 0.93 (0.82-1.06) 0.23 26.3
Subsites
Colon 4 12,17,25 0.77 (0.64-0.92) 0.77 (0.64-0.92) 0.58 0.0
Rectal 2 12,25 0.88 (0.55-1.42) 0.89 (0.58-1.38) 0.31 15.3

RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.