Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug;73(8):783–791. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350650

Table 2 Overview of theoretical models and their results (light grey ░: real reference models [real model 2009 as well as possible real operational results at full capacity utilisation]; dark grey ▓: less profitable and loss-making models compared to real cost models; middle grey ▒: more profitable models compared to real cost models).

Model Brief description of model Bed occupancy (%) Surgical minutes Operating profits or losses (€)
DRG = Diagnosis Related Groups; P-DRG = paediatric DRG
2009 Bed occupancy rate the same as in 2009, same mix of cases, no P-DRG subventions  79.70 %  73 090 145 787.38░░
2009 100 % 2009 model with 100 % bed occupancy rate 100.00 %  91 700 1 124 999.15░░
A No births, no P-DRGs 100.00 %  80 611 − 1 739 546.56▓▓
B All pregnancies or children who are only slightly pathological or not pathological at all are turned away 100.00 % 142 465 − 769 041.28▓▓
C Only less profitable DRGs carried out 100.00 %  34 364 − 638 621.25▓▓
D Surgical capacity (176 880 minutes) distributed across all surgical DRGs; distribution of DRGs according to the share of the respective DRG in the surgical minutes recorded for 2009; no other DRGs; number of beds could be reduced by 6  84.42 % 176 880 − 503 067.48▓▓
E Equal distribution of all bed capacities used in 2 009 for deliveries across the 6 different O01 DRGs (c-sections); bed occupancy rates for remaining DRGs remain the same 100.00 % 135 656 − 75 948.71▓▓
F No P-DRGs 100.00 %  91 700 − 36 074.87▓▓
G Only prenatal DRGs O64A/B and O65A/B and caesarean sections; the same proportion of P-DRGs as in 2009 100.00 % 144 122 319 984.76▓▓
H Surgical capacity (176 880 minutes) shared out completely and evenly (16.67 %) across the 6 different c-section DRGs; no other DRGs; 20 additional beds required which increases fixed costs 155.90 % 176 880 555 085.64▓▓
I Only non-surgical DRGs 100.00 %     0 1 170 873.41▒▒
J Cf. models E and N; instead of the O01/O02 DRGs, this model includes O60 DRGs (vaginal deliveries) 100.00 %  13 092 1 204 986.82▒▒
K Cf. model G; instead of the caesarean sections, this model includes O60 DRGs (vaginal deliveries) 100.00 %     0 1 214 574.84▒▒
L All pregnancies and children with pathologies turned away 100.00 %  72 956 1 415 465.45▒▒
M Share of bed occupancy rates of profitable DRGs are doubled, share of less profitable DRGs are halved; adjustment of calculated proportion of 100 % bed occupancy rate; same proportion of P-DRGs as in 2009 100.00 %  96 038 1 742 922.43▒▒
N Cf. models E and J; instead of O01 and O60 DRGs, this model includes O02 DRGs (vaginal deliveries with complicating OR procedure) 100.00 % 162 377 3 133 122.76▒▒
O Proportion per DRG of the capacity constraint “inpatient days” redistributed across other DRGs as profitably as possible 100.00 % 194 296 3 221 534.33▒▒
P cf. model C, instead of the less profitable and loss-making DRGs this model includes only the most profitable DRGs 100.00 %  92 918 5 108 788.48▒▒
Q 24 OR hours in the delivery room per day (525 600 surgical minutes per year); only caesarean sections and P-DRGs; total of 63 additional beds required 275.01 % 525 600 9 532 718.69▒▒