Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 25;2013:182582. doi: 10.1155/2013/182582

Table 2.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between PCOS and control groups by means of conception, excluding women with multiple gestation (twins or greater).

Group GDM n (%) PIH n (%) PD n (%) FGR n (%) LGA n (%)
Controls (n = 592) 102 (17.2) 19 (3.2) 30 (5.1) 9 (1.5) 71 (12.0)
PCOS (n = 115) 64a (55.7) 11b (9.6) 13c (11.3) 3a (2.6) 16 (13.9)
Spontaneous conception (n = 66) 40a (60.6) 8b (12.1) 6 (9.1) 0 (0) 10 (15.2)
IVF-ET (n = 27) 13c (48.1) 1 (3.7) 4 (14.8) 1a (3.7) 5 (18.5)
Ovarian stimulation (n = 22) 11b (50.0) 2 (9.1) 3 (13.6) 2a (9.1) 1 (4.5)

For key to abbreviations see Table 1.

a P < 0.001, b P < 0.01, c P < 0.05, for all PCOS or PCOS subdivided according to means of conception versus controls.

d P < 0.001, e P < 0.01, f P < 0.05, for PCOS conceiving with IVF-ET or ovarian stimulation, versus PCOS conceiving spontaneously.