Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 16;2013(46):13–35. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt007

Table 5.

Patterns of care for the initial receipt of radiotherapy for colorectal cancer in the United States and Canada*

Site First author, year (ref.) Country Stage Diagnosis year Sample size Age, y, %† Health delivery setting and data sources Findings
Colon Dunn, 2010 (29) United States I–III 1988–2005 187 004 ≥60, 81 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER Less than 10% of nonmetastatic patients received RT; patients diagnosed in 1988 were 2.5 times more likely to receive RT than those diagnosed in 2005
Rectal Kuo, 2010 (30) United States II 1994–2003 329 Range 28–93 California; patients and health services data identified through the registry’s Desert Sierra Cancer Surveillance Program 54% of patients received pelvic RT; among these, 71% received RT postoperatively
Lin, 2010 (31) United States II–III 1998–2005 8978 ≥18, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER 31% of patients received preoperative RT, 37% received postoperative RT, and 31% received no RT
Pisu, 2010 (10) United States I–III 1999–2003 675 ≥65, 100 Alabama; patients identified through registry; health services data from Medicare claims 15% of patients received neoadjuvant RT, 25% received adjuvant RT; over time, a higher proportion of patients received preoperative RT compared with postoperative RT
Latosinsky, 2009 (12) Canada I–III 1984–1997 333 Range 22–88 Manitoba; patients and health services data obtained through CancerCare Manitoba, which houses registry and treatment data 47% of patients received adjuvant RT; receipt of RT increased by stage; 1% of patients received neoadjuvant RT
Romanus, 2009 (32) United States I–IV 2005–2008 2042 ≥65, 50 Multiple states; patients and health services data obtained from the NCCN Outcomes Database Project 93% of stage III patients aged ≤80 y and who underwent curative surgery received RT within 6 mo of diagnosis
Demers, 2008 (13) Canada NR 1985–1999 2925 ≥60, 79 Manitoba; patients and health services data from CancerCare Manitoba (cancer registry and treatment data) Receipt of RT increased 32% to 40% between 1985 and 1999
Dobie, 2008 (33) United States II–III 1992–1999 2886 ≥66, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER–Medicare 55% of all patients received RT; 48% of stage II and 62% of stage III patients received RT
Morris, 2008 (34) United States II–III 1992–1999 2716 ≥66, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER–Medicare 57% of blacks and 65% of whites consulted with a radiation oncologist; among these, 74% of blacks and 83% of whites received RT after consultation
Chang, 2007 (15) United States I–III 1991–2002 21 390 Median 68 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified through SEER 47% of patients received adjuvant RT; increasing age was associated with decreased receipt of RT
Morris, 2006 (34) United States I–IV 1992–1999 10 940 ≥65, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER–Medicare Among patients with stage II to IV disease, black patients were less likely to receive RT compared with white patients (25% vs 34%)
Baxter, 2005 (35) United States Local
regional
1976–2005 45 627 ≥18, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER Overall, 32% of patients received RT; receipt increased 15% to 42% from 1976 to 2000; younger age, male sex, and regional spread was associated with RT use
Morris, 2004 (19) United States Any 1988–1999 52 864 ≥35, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER 47% of white patients and 44% of black patients received any RT; 7% of white patients and 7% of black patients received neoadjuvant RT
Phang, 2003 (20) Canada 0–IV 1996 481 Median 70 British Columbia; patients were identified through the British Columbia Cancer Agency; chart review and physician surveys were used to obtain health services data 60% of stage II and stage III patients received RT; of these, 89% received postoperative radiation and 11% received neoadjuvant radiation
Neugut, 2002 (36) United States II–III 1991–2002 55 204 ≥65, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER–Medicare Overall, 48% of patients received RT following surgery; 11% of patients received RT only for adjuvant therapy
Schrag, 2001 (37) United States II–III 1992–1996 1411 ≥65, 100 Multiple states; patients and health services data identified from SEER–Medicare 57% of patients received RT; increasing age was associated with decreased likelihood of RT receipt
Shroen, 2001 (21) United States I–IV 1994–1996 637 Range 22–94 California; patients and health services data identified from the Cancer Surveillance Program (Sacramento) 14% of stage I, 53% of stage II, 63% of stage III, and 30% of stage IV patients received RT
Colorectal Chan, 2010 (22) Canada IV 2000–2002 411 ≥70, 40% British Columbia; patients and health services data identified through the British Columbia Cancer Agency 63% of resected and 58% of nonresected rectal cancer patients received RT
Ayanian, 2003 (38) United States II–III 1996–1997 1956 ≥18, 100% California; patients were identified from the registry; health services data obtained from physician surveys or hospital records Based on registry data, 58% of patients received RT; this proportion increased to 64% with additional data obtained from physician surveys or hospital records; black and older patients were less likely to receive RT
Wudell, 2002 (26) United States I–IV 1990–1999 668 Median 69, 74‡ Tennessee; data were collected through cancer registry databases at a university medical center and a city hospital in the Nashville area There was no significant difference in RT receipt by race or hospital; at the university hospital, 7% of black patients and 10% of white patients received RT; at the city hospital, 7% of black patients and 6% of white patients received RT
Roetzheim, 2000 (27) United States Any 1994 9551 Mean 72 Florida; patients identified through the Florida Cancer Data System; health services data were obtained from statewide hospital and ambulatory surgical centers, freestanding RT centers, and diagnostic imaging centers Overall, 26% of patients received RT; a higher proportion of male, married, lower income, smoking, Medicaid, distant stage, and rectal cancer patients received surgery

* NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network; NR = not reported; RT = radiotherapy; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.

† For studies where age distributions were not explicitly stated, we include measures of mean, median, or range as reflected in the original study’s presentation.

‡ Median shown at university medical center, city hospital, respectively.