Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: Rev Relig Res. 2013 May 23;55(4):10.1007/s13644-013-0118-1. doi: 10.1007/s13644-013-0118-1

Table 1.

Completely standardized LISREL loadings and weighted descriptive statistics for analyzed variables: Blacks and Whites in ACL waves 1 (1986) and 2 (1989)

Variables Factor Loading
Mean
Standard Dev.
Blacks Whites Blacks Whites Blacks Whites
PUBLIC RELIGIOSITY (Wave 1)
 Attendance@religious services .824 .869 4.018 3.365 1.639 1.818
 Volunteer for religious organizations .472 .616 .294 .254 .438 .436
SUBJECTIVE RELIGIOSITY (Wave 1)
 Importance of religious beliefs .680 .796 3.698 3.292 .543 .872
 Seeks spiritual comfort… .680 .799 3.857 3.315 1.240 1.486
PUBLIC RELIGIOSITY (Wave 2)
 Attendance@religious services .819 .869 3.871 3.316 1.647 1.851
 Volunteer for religious organizations .514 .607 .276 .262 .447 .440
SUBJECTIVE RELIGIOSITY (Wave 2)
 Importance of religious beliefs .745 .803 3.777 3.374 .541 .842
 Seeks spiritual comfort… .627 .873 4.000 3.842 1.205 1.392
MASTERY (WAVE 1)
 I can do just about anything I set my mind to .332 .230 3.466 3.413 .786 .754
 Sometimes I feel…pushed around in life (reversed) .533 .544 2.828 3.047 1.049 .973
 There is no way I can solve the problems I have (reversed) .556 .544 3.090 3.355 1.004 .914
CHRONIC ILLNESS (Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 1.579 1.254 1.413 1.334
IMPAIRED FUNCTIONING (Wave 1)
 Self-rated health .630 .715 3.334 3.635 1.171 1.060
 Activities (not) limited… .847 .826 4.174 4.300 1.290 1.129
 Functional health rating .816 .749 3.531 3.662 .893 .761
^CHRONIC ILLNESS (Wave 1–2) 1.000 1.000 .029 .060 1.131 .999
^IMPAIRED FUNCTIONING (Wave 1–2) 1.000 1.000 .000 .002 .478 .367
UNHEALTHY BEHAVIORS (Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 15.381 19.110 31.030 35.708
PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS (Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 .023 .009 .437 .432
FINANCIAL STRESS (Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 .479 −.129 1.092 .978
NEGATIVE LIFE-EVENTS (Wave 2) 1.000 1.000 .957 .813 .872 .807
SOCIAL SUPPORT [2nd ORDER] (Wave 1)
 Support network size .585 .633
 Informal social integration .314 .555
 Positive interactions… .838 .783
 Negative interactions… −.267 −.224
Support network size (Wave 1)
 #Friends/relatives R can call on for advice or help .577 .502 7.594 10.088 10.782 12.390
 #Friends/relatives R can share private feelings with .470 .515 2.037 2.355 1.675 1.823
Informal social integration (Wave 1)
 How often R talks on the phone with friends/relatives .980 .529 4.319 4.704 1.564 1.293
 How often R gets together with friends or relatives .181 .612 4.048 4.539 1.569 1.410
Positive Interactions with friends or relatives (Wave 1)
 How often do friends/relatives make R feel loved & cared for .768 .786 4.070 4.103 .985 .887
 How often friends/relatives willing to listen (re: problems) .734 .765 3.781 3.820 1.129 1.065
Negative Interactions with friends or relatives (Wave 1)
 How often do friends/relatives make too many demands .645 .599 1.720 1.635 1.039 .910
 How often are friends/relatives critical of R .715 .687 1.852 1.716 1.096 .901
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS (Wave 1)
 Family income .779 .906 3.367 5.056 2.412 2.575
 Education .668 .506 11.415 12.420 3.719 3.033
Employed (Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 .517 .539 .500 .499
Age (Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 52.383 53.728 16.801 17.201
Gender (female) 1.000 1.000 .678 .622 .467 .485
Married (vs. not, at Wave 1) 1.000 1.000 .420 .631 .494 .483

All factor loadings of latent variable-indicators are statistically significant (p <.001)

Capitalized variables are the ones included the causal models