Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 4;9(2):349–361. doi: 10.4161/hv.22736

Table 1. Characteristics of the selected studies (clinical trials).

Bibliography Rank Authors and (Citation number) Year of publication Study design Total experimental n. Vaccinated pre (exp) n. (%) Vaccinated post (exp) n. (%) Total control n. Vaccinated pre n. (%) Vaccinated post n. (%) JADAD score 1 (1–5) JADAD score 2 (1–5) JADAD score 3 (1–5) definitive
1
Rothan-Tondeur et al.21
2010
cluster-RCT
1,201
336 (28%)
408 (34%)
1144
286 (25%)
366 (32%)
-1
-1
-1
2
Hayward et al.**5
2006
cluster-RCT (2003–2004)
1,610
 
570 (35.4%)
1674
 
84 (5%)
4
3
4 (resolving)
2
Hayward et al.**5
2006
cluster-RCT (2004–2005)
1,726
 
527 (30.5%)
1766
 
67 (3.8%)
 
 
4 (resolving)
3
Dey et al.14
2001
cluster-RCT
PHCT*: 457
 
100 (21.9%)
PHCT*: 395
 
83 (21%)
4
3
4 (resolving)
 
 
 
 
NH*: 768
 
78 (10.2%)
NH*: 1364
 
77 (5.6%)
 
 
 
4
Kimura et al.15
2007
cluster-RCT
Ed*: 821
240 (29%)
298 (34%)
1517
467 (31%)
450 (28%)
4
4
4
 
 
 
 
(vacc.day) 832
292 (35%)
410 (46%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(ed + vacc. Day) 754
295 (39%)
439 (53%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
5
Abramson et al.16
2010
cluster-RCT
163
44 (27%)
86 (52.8%)
181
36 (19.9%)
48 (26.5%)
3
4
4 (resolving)
6
Ohrt et al.19
1992
cluster-RCT
180
50
103
175
48
85
2
2
2
7
Lemaitre
et al.18
2009
cluster- RT
989
198
678
1015
200
 
4
4
4
8
Tannenbaum et al.22
1993
cluster-CT
135
23
35
133
22
13
-1
-1
-1
9
Looijmans I et al.17
2009
cluster-RT
Tot. 3,086 (20%)
 
 
Tot. 3,550
(21%)
 
 
4
4
4
(1) All HCWs Vaccinated
774/3085 (25.1%)
 
 
582/3,550 (16.4%)
 
 
 
(2) Physician Vaccinated
43/70 (61.4%)
 
 
37/75 (49.3%)
 
 
 
(3) Nurses Vaccinated
94/179 (52.5%)
 
 
79/287 (27.5%)
 
 
 
(4) Nursing assistants Vaccinated
429/2095 (20.5%)
 
 
296/2,138 (13.8%)
 
 
 
10 Doratotaj et al.20 2008
cluster-RT
200
 
tot. 78 (39%)
200
 
tot. 76 (38%)
1
1
1
 
 
200
 
tot. 84 (42%)
200
 
 
 
 
 
    200   tot. 89 (44,5%) 200          

* PHCT, Pshycians; NH, Nurse; Ed, Educational; **Hayward et al. (2006) The study delineated a pair matched cluster randomized controlled trial during the winters of 2003–4 and 2004–5. We considered the study as two in one and the study have a different and specific context in comparison to the others. ***RCT, randomized controlled trial; CT, controlled trial; RT, randomized trial.