Table 6. Prognostic factors for metastatic patients according to overall survival.
|
Univariate analyses |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall survival(metastatic patients n=41) |
||||
| Evts/pts | HR | 95% CI | P-valuea | |
|
Sex | ||||
| Female vs male |
34/41 |
1.08 |
0.54–2.17 |
0.82 |
|
Age in years | ||||
| Continuous | 34/41 | 0.99 | 0.97–1.02 | 0.64 |
| >65 vs ⩽65 |
34/41 |
1.17 |
0.51–2.63 |
0.70 |
|
WHO PS | ||||
| 2 vs 0–1 |
29/34 |
8.52 |
2.92–24.9 |
<0.0001 |
|
Tumour differentiation | ||||
| Poorly vs well and moderately differentiated |
34/41 |
2.70 |
1.13–6.46 |
0.03 |
|
Primary site | ||||
| Jejunum vs duodenum | 34/41 | 0.60 | 0.25–1.40 | 0.24 |
| Ileum vs duodenum |
34/41 |
1.34 |
0.57–3.12 |
0.50 |
|
Baseline CA19-9 (IU ml−1) | ||||
| >37 vs ⩽37 |
25/30 |
2.13 |
0.61–7.37 |
0.23 |
|
Baseline CEA (ng ml−1) | ||||
| >5 vs ⩽5 |
30/36 |
0.84 |
0.29–2.43 |
0.74 |
|
Palliative chemotherapy | ||||
| No vs yes |
34/41 |
0.67 |
0.09–5.01 |
0.69 |
|
Dual therapy | ||||
| No vs yes |
33/39 |
4.27 |
0.85–21.6 |
0.08 |
|
Metastatic | ||||
| Synchronous vs metachronous |
34/41 |
2.35 |
1.07–5.19 |
0.03 |
|
P53 | ||||
| Overexpression vs normal |
33/40 |
0.96 |
0.47–1.95 |
0.9 |
|
β-Catenin | ||||
| Abnormal vs normal |
34/41 |
1.05 |
0.45–2.43 |
0.91 |
|
MMR phenotype | ||||
| dMMR vs pMMR |
33/40 |
0.52 |
0.15–1.79 |
0.30 |
|
KRAS
status | ||||
| Mutated vs wild | 26/30 | 0.35 | 0.14–0.83 | 0.02 |
|
Multivariate analyses |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall survival
N=26, events=23C index=0.734, likelihood ratio test=17.07 for 2 df,
P<0.001 |
|||
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
|
WHO PS | |||
| 2 vs 0–1 |
14.6 |
0.19–66.5 |
<0.001 |
|
KRAS
status | |||
| Mutated vs wild | 0.37 | 0.15–0.96 | 0.04 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; dMMR=mismatch repair deficiency; Evts=events; HR=hazard ratio; pMMR=proficient mismatch repair; PS=performance status; pts=patients; WHO=World Health Organisation.
Log-rank test.