Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2012 Feb 20;68(3):10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01736.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01736.x

Table 1.

Comparisons between assumptions made regarding nonidentifiable associations in the proposed Bayesian approach and those implicit in the previously-used sequential methods. Assumptions common to both methods are: SUTVA, ignorable treatment assignment, equal individual clinical risk, and multivariate normality of {S(0), S(1), X}.

Sequential Approach

Association Imputation Stage Risk Model Stage
Constant Biomarker
Y(0), Y(1)|X, S(0), S(1) Not Applicable Y(0) ⫫ Y(1)|X, S(0), S(1)
Y(0), X|S(1) Not Applicable No interaction, β02 = β12
S(1), Y(0)|X S(1) ⫫ Y(0)|X Possible dependence, β01 ≠ 0
Bayesian Approach

Association Imputation Stage Risk Model Stage
Constant Biomarker
Y(0), Y(1)|X, S(0), S(1) Y(0) ⫫ Y(1)|X, S(0), S(1)
Y(0), X|S(1) Prior on β02 – β12
S(1), Y(0)|X Prior on β01 – β11
No Constant Biomarker
Y(0), Y (1)|X, S(0), S(1) Y (0) ⫫ Y(1)|X, S(0), S(1)
S(0), S(1)|X Sensitivity parameter, φ
Y(1), S(0)|X Prior on β11β01 and β12β02
Y(1), X|S(0) Prior on β13β03
Y(0), S(1)|X Prior on β01 and β02
Y(0), X|S(1) Prior on β03