Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2013 May 23;425(16):10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.013. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.013

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Effects of proline mutations on SRSF1 binding and phosphorylation. (a) Mutations in RS domain prolines. Residues phosphorylated by SRPK1 are highlighted with brackets. (b) Single turnover kinetics. CLK1 (0.5 μM) and 100 μM 32P-ATP are added to 0.2 μM SRSF1 (●), SR(P200A) (○), SR(P228A) (▲), SR(P235A) (△), SR(P239A) (■), SR(P228,235A) (□), SR(P200,228,235A) (▼) and SR(P235,239A) (▽). The data are fit to a single exponential to obtain rate constants and amplitudes of 0.60 ± .08 min−1 and 18 ± 0.6 for SRSF1, 0.44 ± .05 min−1 and 16 ± 0.6 for SR(P200A), 0.34 ± .06 min−1 and 15 ± 0.6 for SR(P228A), 0.58 ± .04 min−1 and 19 ± 0.4 for SR(P235A), 0.41 ± .02 min−1 and 20 ± 0.4 for SR(P228,235A), 0.25 ± .02 min−1 and 13 ± 0.39 for SR(P200,228,235A) and 0.26 ± .02 min−1 and 17 ± 0.34 for SR(P235,239A), respectively. SR(P239A) was fit to a double exponential with amplitudes of 5 ± 0.4 and 15 ± 0.4 sites and rate constants of 1.1 ± .25 and 0.034 ± 0.002 min−1, respectively. (c) Bar graph showing phosphoryl contents of mutants. Data are taken from the total amplitudes in (b). (d and e) Competition experiments for mutants using SRPK1 (d) and CLK1 (e). Fixed amounts of SR(ΔRRM1) (50 nM) are mixed with either CLK1 (10 nM) or SRPK1 (1 nM) and varying amounts of mutant SR proteins. Mutants are labeled as in (b), and the appKI and KI values are displayed in Table 1. (f) Bar graph showing KI values for the mutants relative to SRSF1 for CLK1 and SRPK1.