Skip to main content
. 2009;32(1):53–66.

Table 2A.

Summary of Preventive Interventions Classified As Most Promising Targeting Adolescents in Three Different Age-Groups

Children Less Than 10 Years of Age
Intervention Type Domain Sample/Ethnicity/Setting Main Results Sources
Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers Universal Family, school
  • 6 schools, 651 students grades 1 through 5

  • Primarily White

  • College town

  • Grade 1 intervention: effects on child physical aggression

  • Grade 5 intervention: effects on patterned alcohol use across grades 6 through 8

Eddy et al. 2000, 2003
www.oslc.org
Raising Healthy Children Universal Family, school
  • 10 schools, 989 students grades 1 through 7

  • Primarily White

  • Suburban

  • Reductions in teacher reports of disruptive and aggressive behavior in grade 2; no effects by parent reports in grade 2

  • Reduction in growth of alcohol use

  • No reduction in alcohol initiation rates

Brown et al. 2005; Catalano et al. 2003
depts.washington.edu/sdrg
Seattle Social Development Project Universal Family, school
  • 18 schools, 810 students grades 1 through 5

  • Multiethnic

  • Urban

  • Grade 2: effects on school-age aggression (White boys only)

  • Grade 5: effects on alcohol initiation

  • At age 18: reductions in heavy drinking

Hawkins et al. 1991, 1992
depts.washington.edu/sdrg/page4.html#ssDP
Nurse–Family Partnership Program Selective Family
  • 300 pregnant women

  • White

  • Rural

  • Mothers: reduced behavioral problems attributable to alcohol and other drug use

  • Children: fewer days of alcohol consumption at age 15

Olds et al. 1998 www.nursefamilypartnership.org
Preventive Treatment Program (Montreal) Selective Multicomponent
  • 166 children grades 1 through 2 with early behavioral problems

  • French–Canadian

  • Urban

  • At age 15: significant effects on drinking to the point of being drunk

Tremblay et al. 1996 www.gripinfo.ca/Grip/Public

NOTE: For more information on these results, see Spoth et al. 2008.