Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Org Biomol Chem. 2010 Oct 15;8(24):10.1039/c0ob00428f. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00428f

Table 4.

Energy difference (ΔEconf-penalty, kcal mol−1) between the conformationally free and restricted conformers of compounds 1–8 calculated at B3LYP/6 – 31+G(d,p) level; ΔGK-AATT binding energies (kcal mol−1) calculated from the SPR binding constants KAATT; binding energies (kcal mol−1) obtained from the docking of these compounds in a DNA model using ArgusLab (GAD-E20) and AutoDock (AutoD-E21); experimental ΔTm (°C) values obtained for these compounds with poly(dA)·poly(dT) in MES buffer; and calculated ΔTm (°C) values with eqn (1), (2) and (3)

ΔEconf.-penalty Δ G K-AATT GAD-E AutoD-E Exp. ΔTm eqn(1) ΔTm eqn(2) ΔTm eqn(3) ΔTm
1 –9.0 –6.4 –4.9 –5.9 17.2 18.6 22.4 18.3
2 –5.0 –7.5 –5.0 –7.2 29.0 30.1 28.4 33.0
3 –6.7 –7.7 –4.9 –7.4 25.3 28.6 25.4 31.2
4 –7.6 –6.9 –4.9 –6.2 23.0 23.2 24.2 22.5
5 –5.3 –7.9 –5.2 –6.5 35.1 31.7 29.4 28.4
6 –3.0 –7.2 –5.2 –6.4 31.1 31.6 32.4 32.0
7 –6.5 –7.4 –5.0 –6.7 32.0 27.4 26.4 27.4
8 –2.2 –7.0 –5.3 –5.6 30.0 31.8 34.2 28.7