Table 1. Payoff matrix for the most relevant strategies.
| ALLD | Forgiver | TFT | WSLS | Grim | ALLC | |
| ALLD | 10.0 | 148.4 | 24.8 | 144.9 | 11.5 | 280.0 |
| Forgiver | −36.1 | 174.8 | 163.5 | 166.9 | −12.7 | 194.3 |
| TFT | 5.1 | 178.1 | 104.5 | 176.7 | 24.5 | 194.5 |
| WSLS | −35.0 | 169.1 | 162.3 | 106.5 | −12.0 | 230.9 |
| Grim | 9.5 | 152.0 | 40.5 | 148.8 | 28.1 | 262.9 |
| ALLC | −80.0 | 177.2 | 176.6 | 67.3 | −28.8 | 190.0 |
(
), the error rate 
%, and the number of rounds in each game 
. There are two pure Nash equilibria in the full payoff matrix: ALLD (
) and Grim (
), both denoted in bold. Excerpt of the payoff matrix with the most relevant strategies when the benefit value