Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722

Table 2.

Characteristics of the research subjects and randomization in the four Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer’s Disease (REVEAL) Study trials

Subjects Randomized study armsa
Comparison Intervention
REVEAL I
 (2000--2003)
Cognitively normal adults with
 a first-degree relative with AD
Genotype nondisclosure
 (AD risk excluding APOE)
Genotype disclosure
 (AD risk including APOE)
REVEAL II
 (2003--2006)
Same as REVEAL I, but
 including older adults and
 targeted recruitment of African
 Americans
Standard protocol
 (in-person educational session,
 extended counseling);
Genotype disclosure
 (AD risk including APOE)
Condensed protocol
 (mailed educational brochure,
 abbreviated counseling);
Genotype disclosure
 (AD risk including APOE)
REVEAL III
 (2006--2009)
Cognitively normal adults with
 or without a family history of
 AD
Condensed protocol;
Genotype disclosure
 (AD risk including APOE)
Condensed protocol; Genotype
 disclosure (AD risk including
APOE, plus APOE-associated
 risk of cardiovascular disease)
In-person risk disclosure Telephone risk disclosure
REVEAL IV
 (2010--2013)
Persons with a diagnosis of mild
 cognitive impairment
Standard protocol;
Genotype nondisclosure
 (AD risk excluding APOE)
Standard protocol;
Genotype disclosure
 (AD risk including APOE)
a

In REVEAL I, II, and IV, subjects were 1:2 randomized for the comparison:intervention assignment. In REVEAL III, subjects were double randomized (factorial design) to receive either Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk information alone or AD risk plus APOE-associated cardiovascular risk information and to receive either in-person risk disclosure or telephone risk disclosure.