Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;74:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2013.03.001

Table I.

Hot-plate test latency time results, by treatment group.*

Time (min)
Group 1 (n = 8)
Group 2 (n = 8)
Group 3 (n = 8)
Group 4 (n = 8)
Group 5 (n = 8)
P Value
Median sec (minimum–maximum)
Basal 13 (7–17) 12 (8–15) 10 (9–13) 13 (8–17) 13 (7–16)
30 15 (11–22) 20 (12–24) 25 (14–29) 17 (12–25) 14 (7–19) 0.0001
60 15 (7–24) 20 (11–25) 24 (13–28) 16 (8–18) 14 (6–21) 0.0004
90 14 (11–23) 17 (13–24) 17 (12–25) 15 (9–17) 13 (8–18) NS
120 13 (8–23) 13 (8–23) 15 (10–25) 17 (10–20) 14 (10–19) NS
150 13 (11–18) 12 (10–24) 15 (12–23) 17 (10–21) 13 (8–16) NS
180 14 (8–17) 15 (11–20) 16 (12–24) 18 (11–24) 14 (11–22) NS
210 14 (7–19) 13 (11–19) 14 (10–22) 15 (12–18) 15 (8–22) NS
240 13 (11–16) 12 (11–16) 14 (12–19) 16 (12–19) 14 (10–19) NS

NS = Not significant.

Group 1: sham, Group 2: perineural levobupivacaine (0.2 mL 0.5% solution) and subcutaneous saline, Group 3: perineural levobupivacaine (0.2 mL 0.5% solution) plus dexmedetomidine (0.2 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine + 20 µg/kg dexmedetomidine) and subcutaneous saline, Group 4: perineural saline and subcutaneous dexmedetomidine, Group 5: perineural saline and subcutaneous saline.

Group 2 versus Group 3 (P < 0.01).