Table 2.

Second simulation scenario: , , censoring is 45% and 25% for and , respectively, , , , , 300 bootstrap replicates, 95% nominal coverage with ECL representing the average CI width

			No NL					NL
Quantile	Variable	Method	Bias	MSE	Cov.	ECL	Power	Bias	MSE	Cov.	ECL	Power
0.25	Variable 1	Portnoy	−0.01	0.04	0.97	0.86	1.00	0.16	0.75	0.95	3.37	0.26
		PH	0.00	0.04	0.96	0.86	1.00	−0.04	0.73	0.95	3.35	0.20
		TW	−0.06	0.04	0.97	0.86	1.00	−0.01	0.68	0.95	3.28	0.22
	Variable 2	Portnoy	−0.01	0.06	0.97	1.01	1.00	−0.19	0.29	0.97	2.27	0.99
		PH	−0.02	0.06	0.97	1.01	1.00	−0.24	0.33	0.96	2.29	0.99
		TW	0.06	0.06	0.97	1.02	1.00	0.02	0.25	0.97	2.21	0.98
	Variable 3	Portnoy	0.00	0.06	0.97	1.04	0.98	0.10	0.27	0.96	2.24	0.53
		PH	0.01	0.06	0.97	1.03	0.98	0.12	0.28	0.96	2.26	0.54
		TW	−0.09	0.07	0.96	0.99	0.97	−0.11	0.21	0.97	2.01	0.44
0.5	Variable 1	Portnoy	−0.01	0.03	0.96	0.73	1.00	0.11	0.56	0.95	2.93	0.32
		PH	−0.01	0.03	0.96	0.74	1.00	−0.07	0.56	0.95	2.96	0.23
		TW	−0.01	0.03	0.97	0.74	1.00	0.03	0.56	0.95	2.98	0.28
	Variable 2	Portnoy	−0.01	0.05	0.96	0.85	1.00	−0.12	0.17	0.95	1.66	1.00
		PH	−0.01	0.05	0.95	0.86	1.00	−0.15	0.19	0.95	1.72	1.00
		TW	0.00	0.05	0.96	0.86	1.00	−0.04	0.16	0.96	1.71	1.00
	Variable 3	Portnoy	0.00	0.05	0.97	0.88	0.99	0.05	0.15	0.97	1.68	0.72
		PH	0.00	0.05	0.97	0.89	1.00	0.06	0.16	0.97	1.74	0.70
		TW	0.00	0.05	0.97	0.89	1.00	0.02	0.15	0.97	1.71	0.69