Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 14;2:134–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2012.04.001

Table 1.

Comparative pharmacokinetic parameters of MLs in different species. This table show example of MLs with different kinetic parameters when administered to the same species, with same dose rate and route of administration.

Administration route (dose) AUC (ng day/ml) T1/2 (or MRT) (days) Vd(/F) (l/kg) Reference
Humans Oral (0.5 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 190 ± 79 0.8 Cotreau et al. (2003)
Moxidectin 451 ± 48 20.2 1.2 Guzzo et al. (2002)



Pig i.v. (0.2 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 75 1.16 5.3 Craven et al. (2002)
Moxidectin 271 14 17.9



Cattle Sc (0.2 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 459 ± 47 5.5 0.45 Lanusse et al. (1997)
Moxidectin 217 ± 15 8.9 0.94
Eprinomectin 306 ± 77 6.8 Baoliang et al. (2006)
i.v. (0.07 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 211 ± 48 7.8 ± 1.6 2.72 Bousquet-Melou et al. (2004)
Moxidectin 115 ± 26 21.5 ± 1.5 14.9



Sheep Sc (0.2 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 230 3.7 Marriner et al. (1987)
Moxidectin 161 16 Hennessy et al. (2000)



Goat Sc (0.2 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 56 Alvinerie et al. (1993)
Moxidectin 137 (12.4) Escudero et al. (1999)
Eprinomectin 63 ± 23 (6.6 ± 1.3) Lespine et al. (2003)



Rabbit Sc (0.3 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 191 2.7 Gokbulut et al. (2010)
Moxidectin 83 8.2



Dog Oral (0.25 mg/kg)
Ivermectin 233 ± 75 3.3 1.20 Al-Azzam et al. (2007)
Moxidectin 491 ± 96 25.9 0.53

AUC, area under the concentration time curve; MRT, mean resistance time; T1/2, elimination half-life; Vd(/F), apparent volume of distribution; Sc, subcutaneous.