Skip to main content
Medical Journal, Armed Forces India logoLink to Medical Journal, Armed Forces India
. 2012 Jul 17;68(4):386–388. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.01.004

Congenital miliaria crystallina – A diagnostic dilemma

Sudhir Dixit a, Ashish Jain b,, Suhas Datar c, VK Khurana d
PMCID: PMC3862747  PMID: 24532912

Abstract

Miliaria crystallina is a transient, superficial obstruction of eccrine sweat ducts resulting in rapidly evolving noninflammatory vesicles. The disease is observed frequently in hot, humid, tropical climates and in the neonatal period, most likely due to lack of maturation of the sweat duct during the first few days following birth. It is rarely present at delivery and remains a diagnostic dilemma for the neonatologists. We report a rare case of “Congenital miliaria crystallina” that was present at birth.

Keywords: Miliaria, Congenital, Vesicular lesion

Introduction

Vesicular and pustular disturbances of the neonatal period are not uncommon. Most of them are harmless; however it is important to differentiate these from potentially life-threatening infectious and non-infectious disorders.1 Miliaria crystallina is commonly considered in the differential diagnosis of bullous diseases in newborns. Studies report an incidence of 1.3% in neonates developing skin lesions within 48 h of life.2 This is a transient, superficial obstruction of eccrine sweat ducts resulting in rapidly evolving noninflammatory vesicles. The disease is observed frequently among neonates in hot, humid and tropical climate. Mostly there is lack of maturation of the sweat duct during the first few days following birth, but is rarely present at delivery.3 We report a rare case of “Congenital miliaria crystallina” presenting at birth.

Case report

A female term baby, appropriate for gestational age with birth weight of 2.65 kg was born to a primi gravida, 28-year-old mother. She was an outcome of normal vaginal delivery. The apgar scores were 8, 9, 9 at 1, 5 and 10 min respectively. General physical and systemic examination was within normal limits, except that the skin was covered with vesicular lesions of variable size and distribution, containing clear fluid.

There was no associated erythema (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Baby with Miliaria crystallina at birth.

Antenatally, mother was a booked case and had not taken any medicine. However mother had fever starting 3 days prior to onset of labour. On investigation her TLC was 12,000 and CRP was positive. LFT, KFT was within normal limits and blood culture was sterile. The mother was treated with antibiotics and antipyretics. Inspite of the above treatment, the mother's temperature in labour room was 101 °F. At birth baby's skin was covered with tiny, closely spaced vesicles spread over face, neck, upper arm and trunk. Vesicles were clear, 1–3 mm in diameter with silvery to shining surface. Tzanck test did not show any acantholytic cells or neutrophils and gram stain found no bacteria. CBC, CRP and blood culture was negative. TORCH screen was negative.

On the basis of typical cutaneous lesions, diagnosis of miliaria crystallina was made in consultation with the dermatologist. Baby was moved to a cooler environment. Over next 2 days no new vesicles erupted. On 4th day vesicles dried and by 7th day skin was normal in appearance.

Discussion

Miliaria results from retention of sweat in occluded eccrine ducts as a result of keratinous plugs. Retrograde pressure results in rupture of duct and leakage of sweat in to the epidermis and/or dermis. Miliaria occurs in 3 forms; miliaria crystallina, rubra, and profunda. This classification is based on the level of blockage of eccrine sweat duct.4 In miliaria crystallina (sudamina), the obstruction of the eccrine duct is very superficial i.e. within the stratum corneum and commonly occurs with febrile diseases or after sunburn, most often in hot and humid climatic conditions. Children are particularly at risk.

Clinically translucent, thin roofed vesicles of 1–2 mm diameter without an inflammatory halo are observed. If opened with a needle, a clear, watery liquid is obtained. Lesions develop preferentially on the neck and axillae. In the neonatal period, the face can be involved as well. This was the case in our infant, too. Vesicles in this location can have a silvery sheen. This is not based on leukocyte influx as in miliaria rubra, but caused by corneocytes in the blister, and is known as a variant called miliaria crystallina alba. The thin roofs covering the blisters rupture easily and the skin clears thereafter, leaving a superficial, branny desquamation.5

The differential diagnosis of neonatal blistering includes several infectious and bullous dermatoses. Herpes simplex and varicella show serous vesicles. Erythema toxicum neonatorum, neonatal pustular melanosis, and acropustulosis of the child show pustules. Staphylococcal infection causes staphylococcal scalded syndrome or large blisters which differ clearly from minute vesicles in miliaria. The most important difference remains that, in miliaria crystallina, the sweat in the blisters is not yellowish, but clear like water. Therefore, the colour and the form of the blisters allow a definite clinical diagnosis.

Therapy of miliaria crystallina is simple. The only effective treatment and prevention is to avoid further sweating. A few hours in a cool environment will bring relief. Other prevention and treatment modalities include avoidance of excessive clothing, friction from clothing and excessive use of soap. Topical antibacterial preparations have some role in preventing the commonly occurring secondary infections in miliaria. Calamine lotion followed by a bland emollient is also beneficial.

In newborns and children, the disease is rather frequent. Thus, in a retrospective study from Japan, including 5387 infants in a newborn ward, miliaria crystallina was seen in 4.5%, with a peak occurrence around the 6th and 7th postnatal day. In this large series, the occurrence was classified as extremely rare before day 4.6 In an Indian study over a period of 7 months, 131 neonates were found to have miliaria crystallina within 48 h of birth.7 Most of the articles are of the opinion that the disease does not occur at delivery.8 It is suggested that duct disrupture is the immediate cause of miliaria.9 The hydration of corneocytes varies with the degree of environmental humidity and temperature. In our patient, the maternal fever might have been the trigger.

There are only 3 reports so far in the literature on congenital miliaria crystallina, two in black newborns10,11 and only one in white new born as in our case.3 The same has not been reported in Indian literature. According to Straka et al,10 who described the first case, the disease most probably derives from immature sweat ducts within the first weeks of life. Probably the occlusion of the sweat ducts had formed already in utero as in our case.

Conflicts of interest

All authors have none to declare.

References

  • 1.Wagner A. Distinguishing vesicular and pustular disorders in the neonate. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1997;9:396–405. doi: 10.1097/00008480-199708000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moosavi Z., Hosseini T. One-year survey of cutaneous lesions in 1000 consecutive Iranian Newborns. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006 Jan–Feb;23(1):61–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2006.00172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haas Norbert, Henz Beate Maria, Weigel Heidrun. Congenital miliaria crystallina. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(5):S270–S272. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.108489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wenzel F.G., Horn T.D. Nonneoplastic disorders of the eccrine glands. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:1–17. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70532-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hurwitz S. 2nd ed. WB Saunders; Philadelphia: 1993. Clinical Paediatric Dermatology. 278–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hidano A., Purwoko R., Jitsukawa K. Statistical survey of skin changes in Japanese neonates. Pediatr Dermatol. 1986;3:140–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1986.tb00505.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nanda A., Kaur S., Bhakoo O.N., Dhall K. Survey of cutaneous lesions in Indian Newborns. Pediatr Dermatol. 1989;6:39–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1989.tb00265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hodgman J., Freedman R., Levan N. Neonatal dermatology. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1971;18:713–756. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)32592-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shuster S. Duct disruption, a new explanation of miliaria. Acta Derm Venereol. 1997;77:13. doi: 10.2340/0001555577001003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Straka B.F., Cooper P.H., Greer K.E. Congenital miliaria crystallina. Cutis. 1991;47:103–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arpey C.J., Nagashima Whalen L.S., Chren M.M., Zaim M.T. Congenital miliaria crystallina: case report and literature review. Pediatr Dermatol. 1992;9:283–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1992.tb00349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Journal, Armed Forces India are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES