Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 17;17(6):298–318. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.10.001

Table 2.

Most relevant factors impacting the SUV.

Patient-related Instrumentation-related Operator-related
Not controllable
• Patient size
• Postural flexibility of the patient for the various treatment positions.
• Capacity of patient to remain immobile in a given position.
• Patient movement and breathing.
• Levels of blood glucose and insulin.
• Non-uniform uptake within the tumour (necrotic centre)
• Diffusion in the tissue.
Controllable
• Radiopharmaceutical
• Isotope emission β+
• Dose administered.
• Residual activity in the needle.
• Uptake time before acquisition of images
• Acquisition time
• Partial volume effect
• Discrimination in scatter events
• Sensitivity
• Mode of acquisition (2D vs. 3D)
• Method used to correct attenuation (CT vs. Germanium sources)
• Truncation
• Movement (different time scales, CT vs. PET)
• Acquisition with respiratory control (4D)
• Availability of corrections for movement
• Artefacts due to CT movement
• Use of contrast agents
• Subtraction of the background
• Reconstruction Algorithm: (Filtered Back Projection vs. OSEM)
• Reconstruction by time of flight
• Incorrect synchronization of watches
• Quality of injection administration
• Acquisition and reconstruction protocols
• Image acquisition time
• Image interpretation
• Difficulty determining the SUV threshold
• Analytical tools not designed to measure a change in SUV
• Interobserver variability
• Determination of ROI