Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Law Hum Behav. 2013 Jun 10;38(1):23–33. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000036

Table 3.

OLS Regression for Psychopathy by Intelligence Moderation Models Predicting Baseline Aggressive Offending Variety (N = 1,354)

Predictor Total ß Factor 1 ß Factor 2 ß
Step 2
 Male .123*** .147*** .122***
 Age .063** .106*** .067**
 Philadelphia −.077** −.082** −.076**
 Psychopathy Variable .474*** .301*** .471***
 IQ .074** .073** .076**
Step 3
 Male .123*** .147*** .122***
 Age .065** .107*** .069**
 Philadelphia −.081** −.085** −.079**
 Psychopathy Variable .474*** .302*** .470***
 IQ .070** .068* .075**
 Psychopathy Variable × IQ .077** .062* .066**

Note: Step 1 ßs for all psychopathy scores: male (.155***), age (.122***), Philadelphia (.129***). For Total Psychopathy: R2= .054, for Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR2= .224, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= .006, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 1: R2= .054, for Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR2= .094, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= .004, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 2: R2= .054, for Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR2= .221, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= .005, for Step 3 (p < .05).

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.