. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 12.

Published in final edited form as: Law Hum Behav. 2013 Jun 10;38(1):23–33. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000036

Table 4.

OLS Regression for Psychopathy by Intelligence Moderation Models Predicting Baseline Income Offending Variety (N = 1,354)

Predictor	Total ß	Factor 1 ß	Factor 2 ß
Step 2
Male	.105^***	.131^***	.104^***
Age	.140^***	.186^***	.144^***
Philadelphia	−.100^***	−.106^***	−.098^***
Psychopathy Variable	.505^***	.311^***	.504^***
IQ	.118^***	.116^***	.120^***
Step 3
Male	.105^***	.105^***	.103^***
Age	.142^***	.142^***	.146^***
Philadelphia	−.104^***	−.104^***	−.102^***
Psychopathy Variable	.505^***	.505^***	.503^***
IQ	.113^***	.113^***	.119^***
Psychopathy Variable × IQ	.091^***	.091^**	.083^***

Note: Step 1 ßs for all psychopathy scores: male (.139^***), age (.204^***), Philadelphia (.167^***). For Total Psychopathy: R²= .085, for Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR²= .261, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR²= .008, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 1: R²= .085, for Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR²= .107, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR²= .008, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 2: R²= .085, for Step 1 (p < .05); ΔR²= .260, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR²= .007, for Step 3 (p < .05).

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001.