Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Law Hum Behav. 2013 Jun 10;38(1):23–33. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000036

Table 8.

OLS Regression for Total Psychopathy by Intelligence Moderation Model Predicting 84-month Follow-up Income Offending Variety (N = 1,354)

Predictor Total ß Factor 1 ß Factor 2 ß
Step 2
 Male .043 .051 .043
 Age −.049 −.034 −.047
 Philadelphia −.012 −.010 −.012
 Psychopathy Variable .193*** .162*** .183***
 IQ .055 .055 .056
Step 3
 Male .043 .052 .043
 Age −.050 −.034 −.047
 Philadelphia −.011 −.010 −.012
 Psychopathy Variable .193*** .162*** .183***
 IQ .055 .056 .056
 Psychopathy Variable × IQ −.005 −.013 <.001

Note: Step 1 ßs for all psychopathy scores: male (.056*), age (.025), Philadelphia (.040). For Total Psychopathy: R2= .006, for Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR2= .039, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= <.001, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 1: R2= .006, for Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR2= .028, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= .001, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 2: R2= .006, for Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR2= .035, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= <.001, for Step 3 (p < .05).

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.