Table 8.
OLS Regression for Total Psychopathy by Intelligence Moderation Model Predicting 84-month Follow-up Income Offending Variety (N = 1,354)
| Predictor | Total ß | Factor 1 ß | Factor 2 ß |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 2 | |||
| Male | .043 | .051 | .043 |
| Age | −.049 | −.034 | −.047 |
| Philadelphia | −.012 | −.010 | −.012 |
| Psychopathy Variable | .193*** | .162*** | .183*** |
| IQ | .055 | .055 | .056 |
| Step 3 | |||
| Male | .043 | .052 | .043 |
| Age | −.050 | −.034 | −.047 |
| Philadelphia | −.011 | −.010 | −.012 |
| Psychopathy Variable | .193*** | .162*** | .183*** |
| IQ | .055 | .056 | .056 |
| Psychopathy Variable × IQ | −.005 | −.013 | <.001 |
Note: Step 1 ßs for all psychopathy scores: male (.056*), age (.025), Philadelphia (.040). For Total Psychopathy: R2= .006, for Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR2= .039, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= <.001, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 1: R2= .006, for Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR2= .028, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= .001, for Step 3 (p < .05). For Factor 2: R2= .006, for Step 1 (p > .05); ΔR2= .035, for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2= <.001, for Step 3 (p < .05).
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .001.