Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8183–8188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8183

A joint hazard and time scaling model to compare survival curves.

S Klawansky 1, M S Fox 1
PMCID: PMC38643  PMID: 8710844

Abstract

To provide a more general method for comparing survival experience, we propose a model that independently scales both hazard and time dimensions. To test the curve shape similarity of two time-dependent hazards, h1(t) and h2(t), we apply the proposed hazard relationship, h12(tKt)/ h1(t) = Kh, to h1. This relationship doubly scales h1 by the constant hazard and time scale factors, Kh and Kt, producing a transformed hazard, h12, with the same underlying curve shape as h1. We optimize the match of h12 to h2 by adjusting Kh and Kt. The corresponding survival relationship S12(tKt) = [S1(t)]KtKh transforms S1 into a new curve S12 of the same underlying shape that can be matched to the original S2. We apply this model to the curves for regional and local breast cancer contained in the National Cancer Institute's End Results Registry (1950-1973). Scaling the original regional curves, h1 and S1 with Kt = 1.769 and Kh = 0.263 produces transformed curves h12 and S12 that display congruence with the respective local curves, h2 and S2. This similarity of curve shapes suggests the application of the more complete curve shapes for regional disease as templates to predict the long-term survival pattern for local disease. By extension, this similarity raises the possibility of scaling early data for clinical trial curves according to templates of registry or previous trial curves, projecting long-term outcomes and reducing costs. The proposed model includes as special cases the widely used proportional hazards (Kt = 1) and accelerated life (KtKh = 1) models.

Full text

PDF
8183

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Klawansky S., Berkey C., Shah N., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. C. Survival from localized breast cancer. Variability across trials and registries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993 Fall;9(4):539–553. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300005468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Klawansky S., Fox M. S. A growth rate distribution model for the age dependence of human cancer incidence: a proposed role for promotion in cancer of the lung and breast. J Theor Biol. 1984 Dec 7;111(3):531–587. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Langlands A. O., Pocock S. J., Kerr G. R., Gore S. M. Long-term survival of patients with breast cancer: a study of the curability of the disease. Br Med J. 1979 Nov 17;2(6200):1247–1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6200.1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. de la Rochefordiere A., Asselain B., Campana F., Scholl S. M., Fenton J., Vilcoq J. R., Durand J. C., Pouillart P., Magdelenat H., Fourquet A. Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma. Lancet. 1993 Apr 24;341(8852):1039–1043. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92407-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES