Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 Feb 25;67(1):94–116. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12008

Table 3.

Monte Carlo Estimates through Mixture Estimation When Two Missing Data Cells are Present

Mixture estimation

Group Growth factor Parameter Generated Two missing cells in different groups Two missing cells in one group
G1 Intercept 5.0 5.000 (.074) 5.000 (.074) 5.000 (.074)
Linear slope 0.1 0.098 (.024) 0.098 (.024) 0.098 (.024)

G2 Intercept 3.0 2.988 (.131) 2.987 (.132) 2.988 (.132)
Linear slope 0.5 0.501 (.043) 0.501 (.043) 0.501 (.043)

G3 Intercept 7.0 6.990 (.188) 6.991 (.188) 6.990 (.188)
Linear slope −0.1 −0.098 (.061) −0.097 (.066) −0.098 (.061)

G4 Intercept 6.0 5.980 (.253) 5.986 (.260) 5.988 (.263)
Linear slope −0.6 −0.615 (.083) −0.622 (.107) −0.620 (.112)

Note. The multigroup latent growth model was based on five indicator variables. Under the ‘Generated’ column, estimates were from the data sets generated at the normative values. Under the ‘Two missing cells in different groups,’ all the responses on the 5th time point in Group 4 and on the 4th time point in Group 3 were completely missing. Under the ‘Two missing cells in one group,’ all the responses on the 3rd and 5th time point in Group 4 were completely missing.