Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 2;179(1):112–119. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt227

Table 4.

Odds Ratios for the Association Between Duration of DM and Risk of Colona Adenomas in a Matched Case-Control Studyb Nested in the Black Women's Health Study, 1997–2009

DM Status and Duration, Yearsc All Participants
Age ≤55 Years
Age >55 Years
No. of Cases No. of Controls Multivariable-adjustedd ORe 95% CI No. of Cases No. of Controls Multivariable-adjustedd ORe 95% CI No. of Cases No. of Controls Multivariable-adjustedd ORe 95% CI
No DM 748 2,212 1.00 Referent 401 1,234 1.00 Referent 347 978 1.00 Referent
Yes DM
 ≤5 51 137 1.07 0.73, 1.56 26 54 1.42 0.80, 2.54 25 83 0.82 0.48, 1.39
 5–9 21 71 0.87 0.50, 1.51 12 27 1.35 0.62, 2.92 9 44 0.59 0.26, 1.32
 ≥10 33 139 0.60 0.39, 0.94 10 32 0.85 0.37, 1.97 23 107 0.52 0.31, 0.89
  Ptrend 0.04 0.66 <0.01

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; OR, odds ratio.

a Cases with only rectal adenoma(s) and matched controls were excluded.

b Cases and controls were matched on age and follow-up time.

c Duration of DM was calculated on the basis of the year of diagnosis reported by participants. For participants who did not report year of diagnosis but who reported a new diagnosis of DM on the follow-up questionnaire, the date of diagnosis was assumed to be the midpoint of the 2-year follow-up interval.

d Adjusted for age, educational status, body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2), physical activity, family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative, menopausal status, smoking status, alcohol intake, total energy intake, red meat intake, fruit and vegetable intake, and regular aspirin use.

e Based on a conditional logistic regression model.