. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 16.

Published in final edited form as: Hisp J Behav Sci. 2013 Nov;35(4):10.1177/0739986313499003. doi: 10.1177/0739986313499003

Table 3.

Hierarchical Regressions Using Youths’ Sibling Caretaking and Familistic Attitudes as Predictors of Their School and Personal Adjustment.

Predictor	Educational aspirations			School engagement			School absences			Grades			Prosocial-caring
Predictor	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Step 1
Youth age	−.17^*	−.13	−.14^*	−.15^*	−.18^*	−.16^*	−.09	−.08	−.07	−.13	−.10	−.08	−.07	−.03	−.03
Youth gender^a	.21^**	.20^**	.24^**	−.08	−.07	−.06	−.02	−.03	−.03	.14^*	.14^*	.15^*	.18^**	.18^**	.22^**
Sibling caretaking	.12	.10	.07	.10	.10	.09	.15^*	.27^*	.28^*	−.09	−.07	−.08	.18^**	.11	.07
Youths’ familistic attitudes^b	.33^***	.35^***	.38^***	.19^**	.16^*	.14	−.09	−.07	−.09	.16^*	.19^*	.17^*	.22^**	.24^**	.27^**
Step 2
Sibling care × Youth age		−.05	−.05		.14	.11		−.17	−.19		−.12	−.14		−.07	−.08
Sibling care × Youth gender		−.02	.02		.13	.02		−.08	−.09		−.05	−.08		.05	.08
Sibling care × Familistic attitudes		−.16^*	.08		.08	.16		−.05	−.11		−.08	−.01		−.15^*	−.13
Step 3
Sibling care × Familistic attitudes × Youth’s age			.07			−.10			.06			−.09			.04
Sibling care × Familistic attitudes × Youth’s gender			−.37^**			−.10			−.04			−.09			−.32^*

	R²	ΔR²	ΔR²	R²	ΔR²	ΔR²	R²	ΔR²	ΔR²	R²	ΔR²	ΔR²	R²	ΔR²	ΔR²

Step 1	.23			.09			.04			.07			.14
Step 2	.25	.02		.10	.01		.06	.02		.08	.01		.16	.02
Step 3	.26		.01	.11		.01	.07		.01	.09		.01	.17		.01

Note. Standardized coefficients are shown.

Coded as 0 = male, 1 = female.

Higher scores reflect strong attitudes of self-subjugation to family.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.