Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e82136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082136

Table 2. Correlation between clinicopathological factors and NPM, TFF3 and TACC1 expressions.

Clinicopathological factors NPM P-value TFF3 P-value TACC1 P-value
Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative
N = 67 N = 75 N = 63 N = 79 N = 70 N = 72
Age
≤60 34 35 P>0.05 27 42 P>0.05 31 38 P>0.05
>60 33 40 36 37 39 34
Gender
Male 48 45 P>0.05 38 55 P>0.05 36 57 P<0.05
Female 19 30 25 24 34 15
Tumor diameter
≤50 mm (small) 47 45 P>0.05 39 53 P>0.05 45 47 P>0.05
>51 mm (large) 20 30 24 26 25 25
Tumor depth
Early cancer (T**1) 12 8 P>0.05 10 10 P>0.05 13 7 P>0.05
Advanced cancer (T2–T4) 55 67 53 69 57 65
Histologic type
Well moderately 8 19 P<0.05 6 21 P<0.05 7 20 P<0.05
Poor, others 59 56 57 58 63 52
Peritoneal metastasis
Negative 61 73 P>0.05 58 76 P>0.05 66 68 P>0.05
Positive 6 2 5 3 4 4
Venous invasion
Negative 65 69 P>0.05 60 74 P>0.05 63 71 P<0.05
Positive 2 6 3 5 7 1
Lymph node metastasis
Negative 26 38 P>0.05 22 42 P<0.05 29 35 P>0.05
Positive 41 37 41 37 41 37
Hepatic metastasis
Negative 60 74 P<0.05 59 75 P>0.05 64 70 P>0.05
Positive 7 1 4 4 6 2
Recurrence
Negative 56 71 P<0.05 55 72 P>0.05 61 66 P>0.05
Positive 11 4 8 7 9 6

P<0.05 Statistically significant;

T: tumor size.