Table 2. Correlation between clinicopathological factors and NPM, TFF3 and TACC1 expressions.
Clinicopathological factors | NPM | P-value | TFF3 | P-value | TACC1 | P-value | |||
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||
N = 67 | N = 75 | N = 63 | N = 79 | N = 70 | N = 72 | ||||
Age | |||||||||
≤60 | 34 | 35 | P>0.05 | 27 | 42 | P>0.05 | 31 | 38 | P>0.05 |
>60 | 33 | 40 | 36 | 37 | 39 | 34 | |||
Gender | |||||||||
Male | 48 | 45 | P>0.05 | 38 | 55 | P>0.05 | 36 | 57 | P<0.05 |
Female | 19 | 30 | 25 | 24 | 34 | 15 | |||
Tumor diameter | |||||||||
≤50 mm (small) | 47 | 45 | P>0.05 | 39 | 53 | P>0.05 | 45 | 47 | P>0.05 |
>51 mm (large) | 20 | 30 | 24 | 26 | 25 | 25 | |||
Tumor depth | |||||||||
Early cancer (T**1) | 12 | 8 | P>0.05 | 10 | 10 | P>0.05 | 13 | 7 | P>0.05 |
Advanced cancer (T2–T4) | 55 | 67 | 53 | 69 | 57 | 65 | |||
Histologic type | |||||||||
Well moderately | 8 | 19 | P<0.05 | 6 | 21 | P<0.05 | 7 | 20 | P<0.05 |
Poor, others | 59 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 63 | 52 | |||
Peritoneal metastasis | |||||||||
Negative | 61 | 73 | P>0.05 | 58 | 76 | P>0.05 | 66 | 68 | P>0.05 |
Positive | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |||
Venous invasion | |||||||||
Negative | 65 | 69 | P>0.05 | 60 | 74 | P>0.05 | 63 | 71 | P<0.05 |
Positive | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 1 | |||
Lymph node metastasis | |||||||||
Negative | 26 | 38 | P>0.05 | 22 | 42 | P<0.05 | 29 | 35 | P>0.05 |
Positive | 41 | 37 | 41 | 37 | 41 | 37 | |||
Hepatic metastasis | |||||||||
Negative | 60 | 74 | P<0.05 | 59 | 75 | P>0.05 | 64 | 70 | P>0.05 |
Positive | 7 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | |||
Recurrence | |||||||||
Negative | 56 | 71 | P<0.05 | 55 | 72 | P>0.05 | 61 | 66 | P>0.05 |
Positive | 11 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
P<0.05 Statistically significant;
T: tumor size.