Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2013 Mar 8;8671:86710A. doi: 10.1117/12.2007610

Table 4.

RMSE for Ta and Te evaluated using 7 feature sets. The symbol * denotes a spurious registration, where the two images had no alignment. The best registration results, obtained from median and Nakagami m-parameter features are bolded.

Feature Attenuation
Correction
Transformation
Tr Ta Te
Initial Alignment 5.50 ± 1.49 mm - -
Intensity No - 4.86 ± 1.58 mm 4.52 ± 1.62 mm
Yes - 4.15 ± 1.06 mm 3.99 ± 1.09 mm
Mean No - 4.88 ± 2.03 mm 4.61 ± 2.05 mm
Yes - 3.73 ± 1.25 mm 3.54 ± 1.17 mm
Median No - 4.75 ± 1.82 mm 4.46 ± 1.65 mm
Yes - 3.79 ± 1.29 mm 3.32 ± 1.05 mm
Range No - 4.42 ± 1.27 mm 4.13 ± 1.34 mm
Yes - 4.60 ± 1.18 mm 4.25 ± 1.22 mm
Variance No - 4.23 ± 0.98 mm 3.92 ± 1.06 mm
Yes - 4.56 ± 1.38 mm 4.36 ± 1.39 mm
Rayleigh
Variance33
No - 4.54 ± 1.76 mm 4.30 ± 1.76 mm
Yes - 3.72 ± 1.16 mm 3.50 ± 0.90 mm
m-parameter34 No - * *
Yes - 3.79 ± 1.15 mm 3.39 ± 0.85 mm
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure