Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e83314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083314

Table 4. Flow cytometry results in the non-diabetic and diabetic mice and rabbit animal models before and ten days after wounding.

C57BL/6 Mice Before Wounding(CMB, n=34) C57BL/6 Mice After Wounding(CMW, n=7) STZ-Diabetic C57BL/6 Mice Before Wounding(DMB, n=11) STZ-Diabetic C57BL/6 Mice After Wounding(DMW, n=21)
CD34+FLK-1+ a 20 (0:81) 40 (10:220) 25 (10:150) 270 (130:600)
CD34+CD133+ b 0 (0:10) 30 (10:40) 10 (0:89) 40 (27:69)
FLK-1+CD133+ 80 (20:206) 140 (50:270) 128 (10:310) 210 (100:384)
CD34+FLK-1+CD133+ c 0 (0:13) 30 (10:40) 9 (0:50) 70 (64:150)
Rabbits Before Wounding(CRB, n=8) Rabbits After Wounding(CRW, n=7) Alloxan-Diabetic Rabbits Before Wounding(DRB, n=8) Alloxan-Diabetic Rabbits After Wounding(DRW, n=13)
CD34+ 132 (102:225) 146 (30:558) 665 (86:1956) 427 (249:3469)
CD34+KDR+ d 105 (55-163) 87 (39:272) 669 (110:1246) 273 (124:1134)
CD34+CD133+ e 0 (0:4) 4 (0:25) 63 (12:249) 39 (4:659)
KDR+CD133+ f 172 (108:251) 127 (58:152) 439 (359:887) 580 (59:1105)
CD34+KDR+CD133+ g 28 (2:35) 6 (0:24) 103 (12:238) 51 (10:167)

As the data was nonparametrically distributed the Kruskal - Wallis test was employed.

Flow cytometry results are presented as events/106

a: CMB vs DMB: p <0.05, DMB vs DMW: p<0.01; b: CMB vs CMW: p<0.05; c: CMB vs CMW: p <0.05, DMB vs DMW: p<0.01, CMW vs DMW: p<0.01; d: CRW vs DRW: p<0.05; e: CRB vs DRB: p<0.05, CRW vs DRW: p<0.05; f: CRB vs DRB: p<0.05, CRB vs CRW: p<0.05; g: CRB vs DRB: p<0.05, CRW vs DRW: p<0.05.