Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;23(4):279–290. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2013.07.006

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Boxplot of the DSC for the rectum, prostate and bladder in the prostate patient cases. The featureletNC method did not work at all, therefore no improvement in registration was observed. (a) The featureletMI and iPlan methods are not significantly different than the RR for the rectum. (b) For the prostate on average all of the deformable registration methods are worst than the starting point of the RR (c) For the bladder, the featureletMI method is not significantly different than the RR but the iPlan method is significantly improving the DSC.