Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;17(12):926–931. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0267

Table 2.

Meta-Analysis of XPC Gene Polymorphisms and Prostate Cancer Association

 
 
 
 
Sample size
 
Test of association
Test of heterogeneity
Polymorphism   Comparsion Number of studies Case Control Model OR (95% CI) Z p-Value χ2 p-Value I2 (%)
rs2228001 Overall C vs. A 3932 3940 5 F 1.05 (0.95–1.15) 0.94 0.35 6.68 0.15 40.1
    AC+CC vs. AA 1966 1970 5 F 1.02 (0.90–1.16) 0.33 0.74 1.49 0.83 0.0
    CC vs. AA+AC 1966 1970 5 R 1.16 (0.73–1.84) 0.62 0.53 13.61 0.009 70.6
    CC vs. AA 1074 1058 5 R 1.14 (0.72–1.82) 0.57 0.57 12.16 0.02 67.1
    AC vs. AA 1676 1710 5 F 0.99 (0.86–1.13) 0.18 0.86 0.50 0.97 0.0
  Asian C vs. A 1124 1272 3 R 1.08 (0.80–1.45) 0.51 0.61 5.87 0.05 65.9
    AC+CC vs. AA 562 636 3 F 1.06 (0.84–1.33) 0.48 0.63 0.92 0.63 0.0
    CC vs. AA+AC 562 636 3 R 1.20 (0.46–3.11) 0.36 0.72 12.56 0.002 84.1
    CC vs. AA 326 362 3 R 1.20 (0.47–3.07) 0.38 0.71 11.11 0.004 82.0
    AC vs. AA 493 575 3 F 1.00 (0.78–1.27) 0.04 0.97 0.10 0.95 0.0
  Gleason AC+CC vs. AA 224 136 2 F 0.85 (0.55–1.31) 0.74 0.46 0.50 0.48 0.0
  Pt AC+CC vs. AA 172 195 2 F 1.18 (0.77–1.80) 0.77 0.44 0.17 0.68 0.0
PAT+/− Overall +vs. − 794 942 2 F 1.39 (1.12–1.71) 3.06 0.002 0.63 0.43 0.0
    +/−and+/+vs.−/− 397 471 2 F 1.30 (1.00–1.70) 1.93 0.05 1.35 0.25 25.8
    +/+vs.−/−and+/− 397 471 2 F 2.07 (1.33–3.23) 3.21 0.001 0.12 0.73 0.0
    +/+vs.−/− 252 298 2 F 2.20 (1.39–3.48) 3.35 0.0008 0.00 0.99 0.0
    +/−vs.−/− 340 436 2 F 1.12 (0.84–1.50) 0.80 0.42 1.71 0.19 41.4
  Bone metastasis +vs. − 304 442 2 R 1.34 (0.71–2.52) 0.90 0.37 4.15 0.04 75.9
    +/−and+/+vs.−/− 152 221 2 F 1.27 (0.84–1.92) 1.12 0.26 1.98 0.16 49.4
    +/+vs.−/−and+/− 152 221 2 R 1.70 (0.57–5.04) 0.95 0.34 3.29 0.07 69.6
    +/+vs.−/− 95 136 2 R 1.79 (0.52–6.14) 0.92 0.36 3.79 0.05 73.6
    +/−vs.−/− 123 193 2 F 1.11 (0.70–1.75) 0.45 0.65 0.54 0.46 0.0

R, random effect model; F, fixed effect model; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.