Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;17(12):898–909. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0223

Table 2.

Characteristics of the Eligible Studies

Author Year Country Ethnicity Sex Age (mean±SD) Menopausal status BMD instrument Study design No. of subjects Polymorphism BMD measurement Covariates Quality score
Lorentzon et al. 2000 Sweden European Male 16.9±0.3 None DPX-L Population-based C 90 −174G/C FN, LS, WB, Humerus None 6
Ferrari et al. 2001 USA Mixeda Female 71.9±5.6 Postmenopausal QDR-4500 Population-based C 434 −174G/C FN, TH, TR, 1/3R, MID, UDR Age 7
Ota et al. 2001 Japan Asian Female 73.2±5.8 Postmenopausal DPX-L Population-based CS 470 −634C/G Radial bone Age, height, weight 5
Fontova et al. 2002 Spain European Female 59.0±4.7 Postmenopausal DPX-L Hospital-based CC 94 −174G/C FN, TR, WT, LS None 6
Garnero et al.-a 2002 France European Female 40.0±6.2 Premenopausal QDR-2000 Population-based C 255 −174G/C FN, TH, TR, WT, LS, WB, DR, MID, UDR None 8
Garnero et al.-b 2002 France European Female 64.0±8.6 Postmenopausal QDR-2000 Population-based C 372 −174G/C FN, TH, TR, LS, WB, DR, MID, UDR None 8
Chung et al. 2003 Korea Asian Female 37.7±6.7 Premenopausal Lunar Pixi Hospital-based CS 331 −634C/G 1/3R None 7
Ferrari et al. 2003 USA Mixeda Female 71.9±5.9 Postmenopausal QDR-4500 Population-based C 451 −174G/C LS Age 6
Yamada et al.-a 2003 Japan Asian Female 46.2±5.0 Premenopausal DQR-4500, Desiscan 1000 Population-based C 279 −634C/G FN, TR, WT, LS, WB Age, BMI 8
Yamada et al.-b 2003 Japan Asian Female 64.0±8.6 Postmenopausal DQR-4500, Desiscan 1000 Population-based C 817 −634C/G FN, TR, WT, LS, WB Age, BMI 8
Yamada et al.-c 2003 Japan Asian Male 59.2±10.9 None DQR-4500, Desiscan 1000 Population-based C 1126 −634C/G FN, TR, WT, LS, WB Age, BMI 8
Ferrari et al.-a 2004 USA Mixeda Female 59.5±9.2 Mixedb DPX-L Population-based C 816 −174G/C,
−634C/G
FN, TR, WT None 8
Ferrari et al.-b 2004 USA Mixeda Male 60.1±9.5 None DPX-L Population-based C 835 −174G/C,
−634C/G
FN, TR, WT None 8
James et al.-a 2004 UK European Female 60.7±0.0 Postmenopausal QDR-4500 Population-based CRT 35 −174G/C TH, WT, LS None 7
James et al.-b 2004 UK European Female 60.7±0.0 Postmenopausal QDR-4500 Population-based CRT 30 −174G/C TH, WT, LS None 7
Moffett et al. 2004 USA European Female 73.0±5.0 Postmenopausal QDR-1000 Population-based C 3376 −174G/C FN, TH, DR, PR Age, BMI, estrogen use, study centerc 8
Nordström et al. 2004 Sweden European Female 75.0±0.0 Postmenopausal DPX-L Population-based C 964 −174G/C FN, LS, WB None 7
Li et al. 2008 China Asian Female 10.0±0.7 Premenarche QDR-4500 Population-based CS 176 −634C/G FN, TH, LS, WB None 7
Czerny et al.-a 2010 Poland European Female 63.3±5.1 Postmenopausal Lunar Densitometer Hospital-based CC 226 −174G/C FN, LS None 5
Czerny et al.-b 2010 Poland European Female 64.8±6.3 Postmenopausal Lunar Densitometer Hospital-based CC 224 −174G/C FN, LS None 6
Deveci et al. 2012 Turkey European Female 57.0±7.0 Postmenopausal NA Hospital-based CC 356 −174G/C TH, LS None 5
Oishi et al.-a 2012 Japan Asian Female 19.3±1.0 Premenopausal Prodigy Advance Population-based CS 100 −634C/G FN, LS, WB None 4
Oishi et al.-b 2012 Japan Asian Female 68.1±4.8 Postmenopausal QDR-A Population-based CS 100 −634C/G FN, LS, WB Age, height, weight 6
a

Mixed ethnicities, >94% Caucasians.

b

Eighty-five percent were postmenopausal women.

c

Unadjusted BMD was also available.

C, cohort; CS, cross-sectional study; CC, case–control study; CRT, cross-sectional on randomized control trial; FN, femoral neck; LS, lumbar spine; WB, whole body; TH, total hip; TR, trochanter; 1/3R, one-third distal radius; MID, mid-distal radius; UDR, ultradistal radius; WT, Ward's triangle; DR, distal radius; PR, proximal radius; NA, not available; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.