Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013 Sep 24;16(4):10.1038/pcan.2013.36. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.36

Table 3.

Cox model results for time to prostate cancer diagnosis by miRNA binding region variants among PRAP Participants with ≥ 1 Follow-Up Visit

African American participants Caucasian participants
miRNA Binding site variants Genotype comparisons Sample Size* HR** 95% CI Unadjusted p-value FDR corrected p-value*** Sample Size* HR** 95% CI Unadjusted p-value FDR corrected p-value***
IL-16 (rs1131445) TT vs CC/CT 256 3.00 1.26-7.12 0.013 0.065 207 0.74 0.31-1.78 0.503 0.838
CC vs TT/CT 256 0.0+ -- 0.988 0.988 207 0.0+ -- 0.992 0.992
ALOX15 (rs916055) AA vs GG/AG 255 1.29 0.55-3.05 0.559 0.932 204 0.54 0.19-1.49 0.233 0.583
GG vs AA/AG MNR# 204 1.25 0.40-3.90 0.695 0.869
RAF1 (rs1051208) AA vs GG/AG 257 0.97 0.22-4.34 0.970 0.988 MNR#
GG vs AA/AG 257 0.75 0.33-1.68 0.478 0.932 207 2.86 0.82-10.03 0.100 0.500
*

Sample sizes vary by number with complete genotype and PSA data available.

**

HR = Hazard ratio after controlling for age, PSA, BMI, and smoking.

***

False Discovery Rated p-value, adjusted for multiple comparisons within race group using Benjamini-Hochberg method.

+

No prostate cancers with CC genotype

#

MNR = model not run, subgroup < 10 patients