Table II.
Study | Study Type | Study Population and Sample Size | Study Aim |
---|---|---|---|
McLeod RS et al.100 | TTO | 20 pre- & post-colectomy UC patients 93 post-colectomy UC patients |
Evaluate perceived quality of life by UC patients pre-colectomy and post-colectomy surgery |
Kennedy ED et al.101 | SG | 65 CD patients | Determine if CD patients value absolute reduction in post-operative disease recurrence attributable to 5-ASA therapy* |
Arseneau KO et al.102 | SG | 32 CD patients 15 non-CD patients |
Determine utilities for CD patients for varying perianal fistula treatments† |
Arseneau KO et al.99 | TTO | 48 UC patients | Determine utilities for steroid-refractory UC for colectomy versus varying medical therapy† |
Byrne CM et al.103 | TTO/SG | 41 CD patients 92 colorectal surgeons 74 gastroenterologists |
Compare preferences for surgical intervention in CD between patients, gastroenterologists and surgeons |
Waljee AK et al.104 | TTO | 150 non-UC patients 150 UC patients 150 UC post-colectomy patients |
Evaluate differences in utility of active UC versus post-colectomy state |
Waljee AK et al.105 | SG/TTO | 150 UC patients 150 post-colectomy UC patients |
Evaluate discount rate used by UC patients when evaluating colectomy |
Brown LK et al.106 | TTO | 17 physicians 150 post-colectomy UC patients 69 moderate UC patients |
Compare physician and patient preferences for active UC versus colectomy |
further discussion in letter to editor107
utilities determined for Markov modeling