Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient. 2013 Dec;6(4):10.1007/s40271-013-0031-2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0031-2

Table II.

Time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) studies in IBD

Study Study Type Study Population and Sample Size Study Aim
McLeod RS et al.100 TTO 20 pre- & post-colectomy UC patients
93 post-colectomy UC patients
Evaluate perceived quality of life by UC patients pre-colectomy and post-colectomy surgery
Kennedy ED et al.101 SG 65 CD patients Determine if CD patients value absolute reduction in post-operative disease recurrence attributable to 5-ASA therapy*
Arseneau KO et al.102 SG 32 CD patients
15 non-CD patients
Determine utilities for CD patients for varying perianal fistula treatments
Arseneau KO et al.99 TTO 48 UC patients Determine utilities for steroid-refractory UC for colectomy versus varying medical therapy
Byrne CM et al.103 TTO/SG 41 CD patients
92 colorectal surgeons
74 gastroenterologists
Compare preferences for surgical intervention in CD between patients, gastroenterologists and surgeons
Waljee AK et al.104 TTO 150 non-UC patients
150 UC patients
150 UC post-colectomy patients
Evaluate differences in utility of active UC versus post-colectomy state
Waljee AK et al.105 SG/TTO 150 UC patients
150 post-colectomy UC patients
Evaluate discount rate used by UC patients when evaluating colectomy
Brown LK et al.106 TTO 17 physicians
150 post-colectomy UC patients
69 moderate UC patients
Compare physician and patient preferences for active UC versus colectomy
*

further discussion in letter to editor107

utilities determined for Markov modeling