Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Bioelectrochemistry. 2009 Mar 20;76(0):10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.03.007. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.03.007

Table 1.

Effect of co-adsorbate on E-DNA signaling, specificity and reusability.

Thiol Chemical formula Initial signal/μAa (Itarget/Ibuffer)/% T-17b (Itarget/Ibuffer)/% T-27b (Itarget/Ibuffer)/% M-17b Specificity ratio Rsc Regeneration (Ireg/Ibuffer)/%d
2-mercaptoethanol graphic file with name nihms524203t1.jpg 3.9±0.3 62±3 70±4 50±3 1.2 85±5
6-mercaptohexanol
HO-(CH2)6-SH
4.7±0.5 71±4 80±3 55±3 1.3 98±6
11-mercaptoundecanol
HO-(CH2)11-SH
4.5±0.4 47±3 60±4 25±2 1.9 96±8
Cysteamine (2-mercaptoethylamine)
HO-CH2-CH2-NH3+
5.9±0.7 90±6 d 90±4 77±5 1.1 89±6
Mercaptoethane sulfonic acid graphic file with name nihms524203t2.jpg 2.6±0.4 80±5 52±3 36±6 2.2 91±7
a

Signal in the presence of buffer.

b

% values of signal suppression (ratio of current signal obtained in target–Itarget–and current signal obtained in buffer -Ibuffer) as a result of target hybridization are the average and standard deviation of measurements performed with four independent sensors.

c

Rs is the ratio of the signal suppression (Itarget/Ibuffer) obtained with the fully complementary target (T-17) to that observed with the mismatched target (M-17).

d

% values of regeneration (ratio of current signal obtained in buffer after regeneration–Ireg–and current signal obtained in buffer–Ibuffer) are the average and standard deviation of measurements performed with four independent sensors.