Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 19;369(1634):20120397. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0397

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Learning to read with phoneme or visual deficits. (a) Phoneme deficits were simulated by changing a correctly assembled phoneme with a phonetically similar but incorrect phoneme with a certain probability (0.05, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35 and 0.45). (b) Visual deficits were simulated by switching a letter with the letter next to it with a certain probability (0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 and 0.10). The dotted line represents the unimpaired network. All simulations were run with a word recognition threshold of 0.15. (Online version in colour.)