Table 3.
ORs and 95%CIs for IFG compared with normal glucose from multiple logistic regression model
| Variables |
Overall |
Men |
Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%) | OR (95%) | OR (95%) | |
| Sex |
|
|
|
| Women |
1.00 (Reference) |
|
|
| Men |
1.99*(1.99-2.00) |
|
|
| Age |
1.03*(1.03-1.04) |
1.03*(1.03-1.03) |
1.04*(1.04-1.04) |
| BMI group |
|
|
|
| BMI < 24 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| 27 > BMI ≥ 24 (Overweight) |
1.44*(1.43-1.44) |
1.38*(1.38-1.39) |
1.69*(1.68-1.70) |
| BMI ≥ 27 (Obesity) |
2.74*(2.73-2.76) |
4.01*(3.98-4.03) |
2.16*(2.15-2.17) |
| Abdominal obesity |
|
|
|
| No |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| Yes |
1.63*(1.63-1. 64) |
1.54*(1.53-1.55) |
1.46*(1.45-1.46) |
| Hypertension |
|
|
|
| No |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| Yes |
1.42*(1.42-1.43) |
1.33*(1.32-1.33) |
1.53*(1.52-1.54) |
| Hyperlipidemia |
|
|
|
| No |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| Yes | 1.17*(1.16-1.17) | 1.06*(1.05-1.06) | 1.25*(1.25-1.26) |
*P < 0.01.
Logistic regression: associated risk factors were selected stepwise in model taking IFG as a dependent variable. Variables included in the model were: sex, age, BMI group, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.