. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 18.

Published in final edited form as: Virology. 2007 Mar 21;364(1):10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.007. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.007

Table 1.

Epitope specificity, TCRβ usage and epitope substitutions that illustrate differences in fine specificity for SV40 T ag-specific CTL clones used in this study

CTL clone^a	Restriction	SV 40 T ag epitope specificity	TCRβ^b	Fine specificity^c
Y-1	H-2D^b	I	7	S206T
				A207G
				N209T
K-11	H-2D^b	I	10	A212G/C
K-11	H-2D^b	I	10	Q213H
K-19	H-2D^b	II/III	10	NA^d
Y-5	H-2D^b	V	7
				Q489A
				D495A
H-1	H-2D^b	V	9

References for the derivation and characterization of each of the CTL clones are provided in the text.

For additional information, see Mylin, et al. 2000.

Substituted epitope sequences which are differentially recognized by these pairs of CTL clones. For further information regarding the fine specificities of the epitope I-specific CTL clones Y-1 and K-11, see Lippolis, et al. 1995 and Tevethia, et al. 1998. The epitope V-specific CTL clones Y-5 and H-1 displayed differential recognition of alanine substituted synthetic peptides (Mylin and Tevehia, unpublished).

Not applicable.