Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;17(4):293–298. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2012.17.4.293

Table 3.

Sensory evaluation of tea infusions with and without fermentation by M. pilosus

Attributes1) NFT2) FTM3)
Appearance 2.63±0.31NS4) 2.55±0.37
Aroma 3.15±0.28b5) 4.11±0.34a
Taste 2.84±0.37b 3.95±0.36a
Color 2.78±0.32b 4.15±0.37a
Brightness 2.85±0.35b 4.26±0.41a
Mouth feel 2.88±0.45b 4.25±0.44a
1)

All attributes were evaluated from very poor (1 point) to very good (5 points).

2,3)

See Fig. 1.

4)

Not significant.

5)

Values are mean±SD of 25 panels, and different superscripts within a row (a,b) indicate significantly different at p<0.05.