Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082385

Table 4. Correlations between the dACC activations and the EPI score percentage of correct AM responses and neuropsychological scores in both groups.

EPI EAM SAM INHIB TMT B-A R-SPAN WM
dACC-EPI YA 0.602 p = .006 –0.072 p = .770 –0.350 p = .141 0.491 p = .033 0.232 p = .340 0.208 p = .392 0.210 p = .389
dACC-EPI OA 0.531 p = .034 –0.089 p = .743 0.190 p = .479 0.547 p = .028 0.242 p = .365 0.009 p = .973 .547 p = .028
dACC-SAM YA 0.031 p = .899 –0.205 p = .398 –0.404 p = .086 –0.080 p = .744 –0.131 p = .591 –0.124 p = .611 –0.273 p = .258
dACC-SAM OA 0.402p = .122 –0.098p = .716 0.191p = .478 0.308p = .244 0.201p = .455 0.081p = .765 0.413p = .112

EPI (Episodic score of EAM). EAM and SAM (percentage of correct responses); INHIB (interference score Stroop, inhibition). TMTB-A (trail making test B-A score, shifting). R-SPAN (running span, updating). WM (digit, visuospatial and multimodal spans, working memory). None of the correlations survived FDR correction.