Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082730

Table 2. Effects of ALK5 inhibitor and shRNA on Wound Healing of HTCE cells.

Culture condition Rate constant 1 Δ%/h Rate constant 2 Δ%/h
Basic medium (9) 3.37±0.71 N.A.
Basic medium + ALK5 inhibitor (3) 1.82±0.15 (P<0.01)a N.A.
GST (9) 3.39±0.68(P = 0.95)a N.A.
GST + ALK5 inhibitor (3) 1.83±0.17 (P<0.01)a N.A.
GST-Lum (7) 5.37±1.17(P<0.01)a 14.83±1.61
GST-Lum+ALK5 inhibitor (3) 1.89±0.33 (P<0.01)a P<0.01)b N.A.
Complete medium (9) 6.12±0.85(P<0.01)a 16.86±1.71
Complete medium + control RNA (3) 5.72±0.86 17.28±0.45
Complete medium + ALK5 shRNAi (3) 5.09±0.83(P = 0.40)c 16.33±1.44(P = 0.34)c
Basic medium + control RNA (3) 3.45±0.63 N.A.
Basic medium + ALK5 shRNAi (3) 2.94±0.32 (P = 0.27)d N.A.
GST-Lum + control RNA (3) 5.29±0.85 16.1±0.93
GST-Lum + ALK5 ShRNAi (3) 2.85±0.71 (P<0.05)e N.A.

a compared to basic medium; b, c compared to GST-Lum; d compared to complete medium + control RNA; e compared to basic medium + control RNA; f compared to GST-Lum + control RNA. P value <0.05 is considered significant.GST – Glutathione S-transferase. Statistical analysis using one way ANOVA: