Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Basic Res Cardiol. 2013 Sep 27;108(6):10.1007/s00395-013-0384-7. doi: 10.1007/s00395-013-0384-7

Table 1.

Hemodynamic data at baseline and at 3 months during rest and stress

Variable Sham Placebo Metoprolol Carvedilol p value ANOVA
Rest
 HR (baseline) 61 ± 8 55 ± 5 54 ± 2 61 ± 7 ns
 HR (3 months) 55 ± 7 62 ± 7 54 ± 2 60 ± 5 ns
 BP (baseline) 73 ± 5 80 ± 6 81 ± 3 83 ± 6 ns
 BP (3 months) 77 ± 4 108 ± 9 84 ± 4* 80 ± 3 <0.05
 DP (Baseline) 52 ± 4 65 ± 7 68 ± 6 72 ± 13 ns
 DP (3 months) 60 ± 5 88 ± 12 68 ± 3 85 ± 7  0.03
Stress
 HR (baseline) 114 ± 5 108 ± 7 119 ± 9 112 ± 9 ns
 HR (3 months) 109 ± 10 119 ± 11 109 ± 9 113 ± 10 ns
 BP (Baseline) 115 ± 5 114 ± 6 116 ± 7 121 ± 5 ns
 BP (3 months) 128 ± 6 175 ± 23 131 ± 7* 138 ± 12 <0.05
 DP (Baseline) 201 ± 28 193 ± 14 239 ± 29 208 ± 22 ns
 DP (3 months) 227 ± 14 283 ± 34 239 ± 27 251 ± 37 ns

Data are presented as mean ± SEM

HR heart rate, BP mean aortic blood pressure, DP double product/100

*

p<0.05 vs. placebo

p<0.01 vs. placebo

p<0.05 vs. metoprolol