Table 1. Holms Corrected Comparisons of Item-Level Adherence Values for Coping with Craving and Drug Refusal Skills Modules.

	Pre-Toolkit Mean (SD)	Post-Toolkit Mean (SD)	t	p-value	d
Coping w/ Craving Adherence
Elicit Client Experiences	2.81 (1.4)	3.69 (1.3)	1.60	0.130	0.65
Teach Cravings Normal, Predictable	2.19 (1.4)	2.88 (1.5)	1.74	0.102	0.48
Teach Craving Types	2.62 (1.5)	2.88 (1.5)	0.57	0.580	0.17
Teach Recognize Triggers	2.19 (1.2)	2.62 (1.6)	1.10	0.289	0.31
Teach Avoid Triggers	1.69 (1.1)	2.19 (1.2)	1.26	0.228	0.43
Identify Coping Strategies	1.50 (0.9)	2.19 (1.1)	2.20	0.044	0.70
Apply Play through the Tape*	2.00 (1.2)	4.00 (0.8)	6.08	<.001	2.00
Apply Seek Support**	2.12 (1.5)	3.75 (1.3)	4.33	0.001	1.16
Apply Distraction	2.94 (1.8)	3.88 (0.8)	2.08	0.055	0.94
Apply Coping Statement*	1.50 (0.8)	3.56 (1.4)	4.66	<.001	1.87
Apply Delay Using*	1.31 (0.8)	3.44 (0.9)	6.25	<.001	2.85
Drug Refusal Skills Adherence
Identify Risky Situations	3.00 (1.5)	2.31 (1.5)	1.43	0.173	0.46
Avoid Risky Situations	1.94 (1.3)	1.69 (1.0)	0.50	0.621	0.22
Refusing takes Practice	1.69 (1.1)	1.62 (1.3)	0.14	0.894	0.06
Teach Refusal Styles*	1.62 (1.4)	4.12 (1.2)	6.46	<.001	1.92
Eye Contact/Polite*	1.81 (1.1)	3.50 (1.3)	4.66	<.001	1.41
Firm No/ “Shut the Door”	2.38 (1.4)	3.44 (1.3)	2.87	0.012	0.78
Leave/Suggest Alternatives	1.81 (1.2)	2.00 (0.9)	0.44	0.669	0.18
Hypothetical Risky Scenarios*	1.69 (1.4)	3.44 (1.1)	4.72	<.001	1.63
Outcomes of Assertive Communication	1.06 (0.3)	1.75 (0.9)	2.91	0.011	1.15
Role-Play	2.00 (1.3)	4.12 (1.8)	4.19	0.001	1.37

Note.

^*indicates p<.001;

^**indicates p=.001.