Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;4:938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00938

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of rating scores for the Metaphor set, the Metonymy set, and the Approximation set.

Pragmatic Literal Anomalous
Metaphor set Meaningfulness 4 (2–4) 4 (4–5) 1 (1–2)
Difficulty 2 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2)
Familiarity 3 (1–4) 4 (3–5) 1 (1–1)
Cloze probability 0.00% 0.39% 0.00%
Metonymy set Meaningfulness 4 (3–5) 5 (4–5) 1 (1–2)
Difficulty 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2)
World knowledge 90.29%
Cloze probability 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Approximation set Meaningfulness 4 (3–5) 5 (4–5) 2 (1–2)
Difficulty 1 (1–2) 1 (1–1) 2 (1–2)
Typicality 4 (3–4) 5 (4–5) 1 (1–1)
Cloze probability 1.66% 11.44% 0.39%

Median and interquartile range (in brackets) are reported for meaningfulness, difficulty, and typicality tasks. Cloze probability and world knowledge results are reported in percentage.