Table 1.
Studies Summarized in the Review of the Reproductive Health Behaviors of HIV-Infected Young Women in the USa
|
Citation |
Sections cited in |
Study design and sample characteristics |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead author, year, reference number | Sexual activity | Relationships | Disclosure | Pregnancy intention | Contraceptive use | Condom use | Study design | Study source (recruitment dates) | Analytic sample | PHIV, BHIV, or both | Includes HIV-uninfected comparison group? |
| Batterham (2005) [48] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
Clinical care sites in 4 cities (2 cohorts, 1994–1996 and 1999–2000) |
Ages 13–24 years (N=351 and N=253); 28%/30% female (Pre-HAART/Post-HAART) |
Not noted, but included many BHIV |
No |
| Bauermeister (2009) [36] |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data, medical chart abstractions of HIV+study participants |
Project Child and Adolescent Self-Awareness and Health Project (CASAH), 4 clinical care sites in 1 city (2003–2007) |
Ages 9–16 years, N=316, 50% female, 60% HIV+ |
PHIV |
Yes |
| Bauermeister (2012) [37] & Elkington (2012) [38] |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
Longitudinal analysis of survey data |
Combined sample using Risk and Resilience in Youth With HIV+Mothers (R&R, 1998–2000) and CASAH (2003–2005) |
Ages 9–16 years, Combined sample N=417 and 420, respectively, 50% female, 39% HIV+ |
PHIV |
Yes |
| Belzer (2001) [25] |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
REACH study (1996–1999) |
Ages 13–18 years old, N=216 participants with 648 study visits, 100% female, 66% HIV+ |
BHIV |
Yes |
| Clum (2009) [8] |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Qualitative study |
3 ATN sites (year not noted) |
Ages 18–24 years, N=40, 100% female |
BHIV |
No |
| Clum (2012) [19] |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
5 ATN sites (2003–2004) |
Ages 18–24 years, N=118, 100% female |
BHIV |
No |
| D'Angelo (2001) [26] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data, lab studies, chart review |
REACH study (1996–1999) |
Ages 14–19 years, N=203, 70% female |
BHIV |
No |
| Dempsey (2012) [20] |
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
5 ATN sites (2005–2006) |
Ages 16–24 years, N=146, 48% female |
Both (87% BHIV) |
No |
| Ezeanoule (2006) [41] |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
FXB clinic, University of Medicine & Dentistry of NJ (2003–2004) |
Ages 13–24 years, N=57, 100% female |
PHIV |
No |
| Fair (2012) [35] |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
Qualitative study |
2 clinics (2011–2012) |
Ages 15–30 (mean 20.7 years), N=35, 66% female |
PHIV |
No |
| Finger (2012) [9] |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
5 ATN sites (2003–2004) |
Ages 13–24 years, N=130, 100% female |
BHIV |
No |
| Finocchario-Kessler (2012) [39] |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
Combined sources: Neighborhood Influences on Adolescent and Adult Health (NIAAH) household- based survey+convenience sample of patients from 1 clinical care site (2004–2008) |
Ages 15–24 years, N=401, 100% female, 11% HIV+ |
Both (44% PHIV) |
Yes |
| Jennings (2009) [21] |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
15 ATN sites (2003–2004) |
Ages 13–24 years, N=176, 100% female (sample of 177 MSM also surveyed) |
BHIV |
No |
| Koenig (2007) [14] |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data and chart abstraction |
Perinatal Guidelines Evaluation Project, 4 sites (1997–1999) |
Ages 13–21 years, N=147, 100% female, 42% HIV+ |
BHIV |
Yes |
| Koenig (2010) [29] |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data, chart review |
Adolescent Impact Study, 5 clinics in 3 cities (2002–2005) |
Age 13–21 years, N=166, 53% female |
Both (60% PHIV) |
No |
| Lam (2007) [46] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data, chart review |
1 urban site (2002–2003) |
Ages 16–25 years, N=66, 49% female |
Not stated |
No |
| Leonard (2010) [34] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Qualitative study |
HIV clinics in 1 urban area (2007) |
Ages 13–24 years, N=20, 75% female |
Both (60% PHIV) |
No |
| Marhefka (2011) [33] |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
Qualitative study |
Clinical care site in 1 city (year not noted) |
Ages 12–16 years, N=20, 100% female |
PHIV |
No |
| Massad (2007) [31] |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Longitudinal analysis of survey data |
Women's Interagency HIV Study or WIHS (1994–2005) |
Ages<20 to over 50 years, total sample=2784 with 71 women under age 20, 100% female, 31% of women under age 20 were HIV+ |
Not noted but 75% BHIV |
Yes |
| Mellins (2011) [40] |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
Pediatric HIV/ AIDS Cohort Study or PHACS, 15 sites (2007–2010) |
Ages 10–16 years, N=349, 50% female, 68% HIV+ |
PHIV |
Yes |
| Murphy (2001) [27] |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
Longitudinal analysis of survey data |
REACH study (1996–1999) |
Youth mean age 17 (SD 1.1), N=323, 74% female |
BHIV |
No |
| Nugent (2010) [22] |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
5 ATN sites (year not noted) |
Ages 16–24 years, N=122, 43% female |
Not noted but likely many BHIV |
No |
| O'Brien (2003) [47] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
2 clinical care sites in 1 city (2000) |
Ages 18 and older, N=269 overall, N=28 for those ages 18–22 years, 48% female |
Both but mostly PHIV (91%) |
No |
| Orban (2010) [30] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data, chart review |
Adolescent Impact Study, 5 clinics in 3 cities (2002–2005) |
Ages 13–21 years, N=166, 53% female |
Both (60% PHIV) |
No |
| Outlaw (2010) [23] |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
4 ATN sites and 1 one non-ATN site (year not noted) |
Ages 16–24 years, N=186, 48% female |
Both (83% BHIV) |
No |
| Setse (2011) [32] |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Chart abstraction, one point in time |
Longitudinal Epidemiologic Study to Gain Insight into HIV/AIDS in Children and Youth or LEGACY, 22 cities (2006) |
Ages 13– 24 years, N=752, 56% female |
Both (76% PHIV) |
No |
| Sturdevant (2001) [28] |
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
REACH study (1996–1999) |
Ages 13–19 years, N=243, 100% female, 63% HIV+ |
BHIV |
Yes |
| Tanney (2010) [24] |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data |
4 ATN sites+1 non-ATN site (year not noted) |
Youth with mean age 20.4 (SD 2.46), N=352 (screener data), 42% female |
Both (80% BHIV) |
No |
| Wiener (2006) [42] |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Cross-sectional analysis of survey data, chart review |
Patients seen at 1 National Cancer Institute clinical care site (2003) |
Ages 13–24 years, N=40, 62% female |
PHIV or tranfusion-infected only |
No |
| Total: | 7 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |||||
a
Two additional review articles are not included in this table: Koenig 2011 [16] and Eustace 2010 [15].
BHIV, Behaviorally-infected youth; HAART, Highly-active anti-retroviral therapy; PHIV, Perinatally-infected youth.