Table 3.
Connotation | Feedback | |
Patient interviews | ||
|
−a | Computer skills influenced the work with the support system |
|
+b | Facilitating treatment outside the therapy room |
|
+ | Memory support and learning |
|
+ | Positive experiences of the treatment |
|
+ | Positive implications for homework assignments |
|
+ | Potential to gain an overview of the treatment process |
|
+ | Promoted a sense of autonomy and responsibility |
|
+ | Supported maintenance after therapy |
|
+ | The library—an individualized supplement |
|
+ | The use of the support system during and between sessions |
|
+/−c | The iPad was not seen as an obstacle |
|
+/− | Working with digital material—helpful or unnecessary |
Therapist interviews | ||
|
− | For patients with less computer experience, ICBT hampered the work |
|
+ | Increased therapist skills by providing overview of the therapy process |
|
+ | Positive experience of communication between sessions |
|
+ | Positive experiences using the support system |
|
+ | The library—an important support |
|
+ | The support system promoted additional structure in the therapy |
|
+ | The use of the support system during and between sessions |
|
+/− | Heterogeneity in amount of time engaging in treatment |
|
+/− | Pros and cons of the support system as a substitute to the face-to-face sessions |
|
+/− | Pros and cons of using the support system in face-to-face sessions |
|
+/− | The support system affected the therapists’ workload |
a −, negative feedback
b +, positive feedback
c +/−, positive and negative feedback