Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 28;2(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2886

Table 1.

Participant characteristics. χ2 used to derive P values shown for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, ever had friends/family diagnosed with CRC, and ever had a colonoscopy. Analysis of variance–ANOVA used to derive P values for health literacy scores, numeracy, and self-efficacy.

Characteristic n %
Study sample
438 100.0
Study site


Georgia 130 29.7

Hawaii 105 24.0

Massachusetts 203 46.3
Race/ethnicity


Black/African-American 65 14.8

Asian/Pacific Islander 45 10.3

White/Caucasian 286 65.3

Other or not reported 42 9.6
Language spoken at home


English 419 95.7

English and other 9 2.1

Other 7 1.6
Education


High School degree or less (includes technical school) 104 23.7

At least some college 331 75.6
Age (in years)


40-49 52 11.9

50-59 157 35.8

60-73 229 52.3
Gender


Male 191 43.6

Female 247 56.4
Marital status


Married 282 64.4

Unmarried 153 34.9
Work status


Working for pay 260 59.4

Retired 126 28.8

Disabled 17 3.9

Other 35 8.0
Self-reported health status


Excellent/very good 240 54.8

Good/fair/poor 197 45.0
Number of comorbidities


0/1 336 76.7

2+ 99 22.6
Current smoking status


Current smoker 27 6.2

Current nonsmoker 410 93.6
Has doctor ever recommended that you be screened for CRC cancer?


Yes 385 87.9

No 48 11.0
Completed any type of CRC screening?


Yes 382 87.2

No 50 11.4
Ever had a colonoscopy?


Yes 318 72.6

No 114 26.0
Health literacy, numeracy, and efficacy measures, mean (SD)
Verbal health literacy (CMLT-Listening) 79.9 (14.1)
Print health literacy (CMLT-Reading) 84.8 (14.6)
Numeracy 78.5 (21.9)

Self-efficacy (PEPPI) 8.1 (1.3)