Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 27;31(5):050820. doi: 10.1116/1.4818423

Table III.

Strengths and limitations of primary methods discussed in this review.

Technique Strengths Limitations or issues
XPS
  • Generally available and easy to obtain useful qualitative information about the near surface region of films or particles

  • Identifies unexpected elements and oxidation state

  • Useful to estimating average coating thickness less than 10 nm

  • Significant range of other quantitative information possibleusing detailed analysis and modeling

  • Needs appropriate sample preparation and handling to minimize information loss.

  • Requires vacuum

  • Laboratory configurations cannot analyze individual particles, requires collection of particles

  • New developments could speed quantitative analysis of nanomaterials

AES
  • Identifies unexpected elements present

  • Useful for estimating coating thickness if less than 10 nm

  • With limitations can characterize individual nanoparticles

  • Requires vacuum

  • Needs appropriate sample preparation and handling to minimize information loss

  • Beam damage a concern, particularly with regard to insulators and organic particles and coatings

SIMS
  • Can provide molecular information about film and particles surfaces

  • Determine presence of trace elements

  • Most instruments cannot characterize individual particles, therefore requires a collection of particles

  • Needs appropriate sample preparation and handling to minimize information loss

  • Sputter rates accelerated for nanoparticles

  • Nanoparticles can melt or transform, sputtering can destroy the size, shape, and composition of the particles

  • Requires vacuum

LEIS
  • Sometimes describes as the most surface sensitive analysis method

  • Easily determines the presence of elements at the outer atomic layer of a sample, therefore great at looking at coating uniformity and presence of some defects on nanoparticle and flat surface coatings

  • Contamination easily masks signal, needs careful sample preparation and handling to minimize information loss

  • Requires vacuum and a collection of particles for analysis—high sensitivity

MEIS
  • With sample structure modeling provides high resolution depth distribution in films and particles

  • Cannot analyze individual particles and most information if single layer of particles on a substrate that does not interfere with desired analysis

  • Requires vacuum

AFM
  • Easily identifies presence of particles and particle shape on a flat surface

  • Measurements can be made in vacuum, gas or liquid environments

  • Tip shape can become convoluted with measurements

  • Cannot provide direct chemical information

STM
  • Easily visualize presence of particles

  • Can be conducted in vacuum, gaseous and in some cases liquid environments

  • No direct structural or chemical information

  • Requires some degree of electrical conduction

SFG-VS
  • Selectively probe chemical identity, molecular structure and interactions from vibrational spectra of particle surfaces or interfaces in vacuum, liquid or gaseous environment with submonolayer sensitivity

  • No need for total internal reflections

  • Requires modeling and spectral data interpretation

NMR
  • Molecular information available from a variety of environments

  • Not inherently surface sensitive

  • “Tricks” may need to be employed to obtain sensitivity and extract desired information