Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;64:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.08.003. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.08.003

Table 1. Cardiac function of WT and TG mice.

2 months 10 months
WT (n=5-10) TG (n=5-12) WT (n=8) TG (n=10)
HR, bpm 662 ± 21 435 ± 45 * 707 ± 32 451 ± 23
AWd, mm 0.89 ± 0.07 0.77 ± 0.11 * 0.99 ± 0.11 0.89 ± 0.10
PWd, mm 0.86 ± 0.06 0.78 ± 0.06 * 1.03 ± 0.16 0.94 ± 0.08
LVDs, mm 1.47 ± 0.20 3.07 ± 0.32 * 1.54 ± 0.24 3.27 ± 0.43
LVDd, mm 3.10 ± 0.18 4.19 ± 0.19 * 3.28 ± 0.27 4.38 ± 0.41
&emspEF, % 83.9 ± 4.7 52.5 ± 7.8 * 85.1 ± 7.8 50.2 ± 8.3
&emspBW, g 26.0 ± 1.7 26.0 ± 1.6 35.5 ± 3.3 36.1 ± 2.1
LVP, mmHg 90.1 ± 2.5 93.2 ± 4.6
LV dp/dt max, mmHg/sec 5963 ± 467 4265 ± 94 *
LV dp/dt min, mmHg/sec -5240 ± 251 -3866 ± 152 *

HR: heart rate; AWd: anterior wall diameter; PWd: posterior wall diameter; LVDd: left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVDs: left ventricular systolic diameter; EF: ejection fraction; LVP: left ventricular systolic pressure; LV dp/dtmax, the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure rise; LV dp/dt min, the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure decrease; Values are expressed as mean ± SD. n indicates number of mice;

*

P<0.05 vs WT at 2 months,

P<0.05 vs WT at 10 months.